CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175891

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2017

6 juillet 2017

    Relevant domestic law and practice The relevant domestic law and practice governing the cassation review of judicial decisions after they become final in force as of 1   January 2012

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56287

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2003

20 octobre 2003

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Lundevall case delivered on 12   November 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;HEARINGS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1318845-1375974

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2005

26 avril 2005

  He became eligible for parole on 5 July 1979 after 15 years in prison. In 1981, 1992 and 1998 he applied for presidential pardon, but this was refused.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-83931

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2007

5 décembre 2007

judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter referred to as “the Convention” and “the Court”);   Having regard to the judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56288

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2003

20 octobre 2003

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Salomonsson case delivered on 12 November 2002 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-121026

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2013

14 mai 2013

He became entitled to a ‘service pension’ ( szolgálati nyugdíj ) in the monthly amount of 219,500 Hungarian forints [1] (in 2012). On 28 November 2011 Parliament enacted Act no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-68980

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2005

25 avril 2005

Convention”),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Mazurek case delivered on 1   February 2000 and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers once it had become

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0607JUD003399406

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2011

7 juin 2011

These judgments became final as no appeal was filed against them. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0405JUD001077509

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2016

5 avril 2016

    On 19 December 2007 the Kaliningrad Regional Court upheld on appeal the judgment of 17 September 2007, which became final. 16.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0427JUD002268410

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2021

27 avril 2021

Bearing in mind that the applicant had already brought on 21 March 2005 ( sic ) an action for compensation in relation to the explosion in question, the court held that he must have become aware of the

Source officielle
CJUE

CJUE

ECLI:EU:C:2005:39

CJUE

20 janvier 2005

20 janvier 2005

#SmithKline Beecham plc proti Lægemiddelstyrelsen.#Žádost o rozhodnutí o předběžné otázce: Østre Landsret - Dánsko.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0301JUD005868112

Admin. suprême

1 mars 2018

1 mars 2018

After his release from prison, their relationship strengthened and became close.

Source officielle
CA

Pôle 4 - Chambre 1

66ff85d0a4ff9ec259c098ca

Appel

3 octobre 2024

3 octobre 2024

EXPRO, JCP d'[Localité 2]-[Localité 1] le 05 Février 2024 Appelants : Monsieur [S] [D], représenté par Me Cécile MONCALIS de la SELARL BECAM-MONCALIS, avocat au barreau d'ESSONNE Madame [G] [D],

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0405JUD000594504

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2007

5 avril 2007

    This settlement was confirmed by a judgment of the Commercial Court of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutiya) delivered on 11 June 2002, and became enforceable. 9.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-106915

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2011

14 septembre 2011

The judgment became final in 1998.   In 2003, the applicant was arrested at Amsterdam airport under an international arrest warrant issued by the Italian authorities.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0808JUD005892200

Admin. suprême

8 août 2006

8 août 2006

The judgment became final on 6 July 1999. B.     Proceedings before the Marmaris Civil Court of First Instance 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1122JUD002987502

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2007

22 novembre 2007

This judgment was upheld by the Regional Court on 21   February   2000 and became final.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1025JUD000420403

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 2007

25 octobre 2007

    This judgment became final and on 3   June   1998 the bailiffs instituted enforcement proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905JUD004453310

Admin. suprême

5 septembre 2017

5 septembre 2017

  Montenegro (dec.), no. 59129/15, § 30, 18 October 2016), while a constitutional appeal became effective as of 20 March 2015 (see Siništaj and Others v.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1605795-1685384

Admin. suprême

7 mars 2006

7 mars 2006

It was true that neither the Warnock Report nor the Green Paper discussed what was to happen if the parties became estranged during treatment.

Source officielle

Page 38 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →