In its observations to the Administrative Court the applicant company limited its claim to the statutory interest for being kept out of its money.

  From around 9 to 12 October, the 11 men were detained outside under guard at Kepir by the security forces, where all but one were tied up.

They had then put him in a vehicle kept at the prison by the gendarmes who were responsible for the external security of the prison, and taken him to hospital.

This system of leave of absence and the fact that the management kept the applicant’s identity papers had placed significant restrictions on his personal liberty.

HENRY and Antony HINES against the United Kingdom and registered on 1 October 1996 under file No. 33269/96;     Having regard to:   -   the reports provided for in Rule 47 of the Rules

  While in detention the applicant claimed: that he was stripped naked and beaten, deprived of food and water and prevented from going to the toilet; that he was kept in a small, dark cell, threatened

They contend under Article 5 of the Convention that Sinan Yanar was kept in police custody for excessive length of time.

According to the information in the case-file, the examination on the merits of the case is still pending before the Constitutional Court.

They requested, inter alia , to be allowed to have access to the investigation file.

by the court, had access to the file. 23.

The applicants then unsuccessfully attempted to obtain copies of the acquittal files via the courts.

At each of the 12 hearings – lasting on average about four hours – before the Court of Appeal, he was kept in a metal cage.

The initial (from 7 to 9 December 2020) and final (from 22 to 29 December 2020) stage of his detention took place in the detention facility in Prešov, where he was kept in three different cells, always

Submitting that the prosecution had consistently failed to transmit all documents to the defence and had even kept important documents outside the case-file, the defence argued that on this basis the prosecution

Lastly, he complained that the parties were unable to access the case-file during the court’s office hours.

margin-bottom:0pt; border-bottom:1pt solid #000000; padding-bottom:1pt } .sDF790F1E { margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } Information Note on the Court’s case-law 167 October 2013 Keller

audience publique du 16 Mai 2024 du tribunal judiciaire DE MARSEILLE, tenue par Mme BENHARKAT, Juge de l’exécution par délégation du Président du Tribunal Judiciaire de Marseille, assistée de Madame KELLER

    On 3 September 2002 the first applicant and his wife went to the filtration point. They saw that the apprehended men were being kept in the barn.

They read that his request for an adjournment had been based only on his assertion that he had not read the investigation file and no mention was made of the reasons of him not having read the file.