case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

circumstances and at different times the applicants were detained on criminal charges and placed in one of the remand prisons of the Astrakhan Region pending trial.

    In the evening of 14 June 2013 a wave of demonstrations against that government erupted in various cities and towns throughout the country.

  Throughout his detention the applicant has been held in various facilities, including Remand Prison IZ-50/9 in the region of Moscow, notably between 27 May and 5 October 2002.

  72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8   October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies, and Martynyuk v.

    The applications listed in the Appendix to the present judgment were communicated to the Government on various dates. 4.     The Government were represented by their Agent. 5.

[Section I] Article 13 Effective remedy Failure to exhaust new remedy dealing with prolonged non-enforcement of final decisions awarding compensation for property expropriated during the communist regime

The applicant had attempted to convey, in a seemingly unbiased manner, various ideas and views of both sides of the conflict.

She presented medical certificates concerning her invalidity and a certificate from a medical commission stating that she had been recommended not to travel outside the Zaporizhzhya Region.

On 3 November 2010 the applicant was arrested in the town of Dolgoprudniy in the Moscow Region, in connection with the international search warrant against him.

    Background information In March 2014 demonstrations by anti-government groups took place in the Lugansk region of Ukraine.

As noted by various sources, large numbers of Christians have travelled to the Kurdistan Region and found refuge there. 36.

Arūnas Kudrevicius, born in 1970 and living in Vaitkūnai village, Utenos region; Mr. Artūras Pilota, born in 1973 and living in Ožkasviliai village, Marijampolė region; Mr.

    The applicants, who had served in various national law-enforcement agencies and had been employed by various legal entities, were dismissed.

    The applicants also produced various medical documents, which confirmed that they suffered from certain chronic diseases.

mars 2017 sont instruites et délivrées selon les dispositions législatives et réglementaires dans leur rédaction antérieure à l'entrée en vigueur de la présente ordonnance ; après leur délivrance, le régime

case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article   34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various

; (4)     Mr Krapivkin Vyacheslav Semenovich, born in 1940 and residing in Kalach, the Voronezh Region.

The applicants were parties to civil proceedings that took place in courts of ordinary jurisdiction and in commercial courts in various regions of Russia.

By the same judgment eleven other individuals, including V.Z., were convicted of various counts of theft in association with the applicant and sentenced to various penalties.