The applicant was seeing A when agreed between the parties, i.e. only on a few occasions, for 2-3 hours each time.

    Proceedings concerning the vacation of the plot of land and the house 40.     In 1957 K. bought a plot of land and a three-bedroom house located thereon from the State.

The applicant then appealed to the House of Lords. 10.

He would always ensure that the door to the house was locked, including when he was at home, and the family would live very quietly and without putting any lights on to make it look as if the house was

The house was also built prior to 23 November 1990.

    On 26 April 2013 the first applicant lodged a request with the Nasimi District Court asking to be put under house arrest in place of pre ‑ trial detention.

The trial judge had therefore been incorrect to draw an analogy between these situations.

The draw-bars of the door had been wholly or partly sawn through with a hacksaw.

On 6 February 1995 the court accordingly asked Professor B. to draw up the expert report.

Preliminary detention of a suspect shall not last for more than seventy-two hours.

Fire service records indicate that the applicant spent, on average, four and a half hours per week at work, including time spent attending fires and other incidents.

          The applicant was brought on the same day before the investigating judge at 15.45 hours and released from custody at approximately 16.30 hours.

the time when the officers had boarded her RHIB, and over thirty-seven hours from the time of her formal arrest. 39 .

They arrived there approximately one hour later, on the way having picked up another person who had been lying on the ground unconscious somewhere else. 12.

He was subsequently placed under house arrest until July 2001.

Detention without a court order is permitted only for up to 48 hours. 2.

  The applicant is the joint-owner of a grocery / off-licence business with his mother and has paid the mortgage on his house.

Thereupon Police Officer F. took out his service gun and ordered the applicant to drop the wooden bar. He dropped the wooden bar and ran away.

The applicant stated that legal regulations did not provide for an obligation to organise an unplanned visit to the patient’s house if the patient had refused to come to the medical institution.