FLAM / [T] ORDONNANCE DU JUGE DE LA MISE EN ETAT SUR INCIDENT Ordonnance du 20 Mai 2026 Copie exécutoire à : Me Caroline BEAUD - 984 la SELARL JUDICAL-CLERGUE-ABRIAL - 26 copie dossier

HENRI , ELU CONSEILLER MUNICIPAL DE LA COMMUNE D'ANGERVILLIERS LE 13 MARS 1977 EST LE BEAU-FRERE DU SIEUR Y... ANDRE ELU LE MEME JOUR QUE LUI ; QUE, SI LA DAME X...

CETAT16-02-05-01 COMMUNE - ORGANES DE LA COMMUNE - CONSEILLERS MUNICIPAUX - DEMISSION D'OFFICE - Conseillers élus dans deux sections différentes d'une commune comptant plus de 500 habitants, devenus beaux-frères

. # Imposte indirette - Imposta sulla vendita di bevande alcoliche - Incompatibilità con il diritto comunitario - Ripetizione dell'imposta. # Causa C-147/01.

#Beroep tot nietigverklaring - EOGFL - Van communautaire financiering uitgesloten uitgaven - Steun aan producenten van bepaalde akkerbouwgewassen - Gemeenschappelijke ordening der markten in de sector

Artikelen 39 EG en 42 EG - Voormalige migrerende werknemer - Beroepsactiviteit uitgeoefend in lidstaat van herkomst en in andere lidstaat - Pensionering in lidstaat van herkomst - Door twee lidstaten betaalde

solaires, les mêmes rabais en août, 30 % sur toute la parfumerie en septembre, 30 % sur les produits de soins et de maquillage en octobre et 25 % sur les autres produits, 30 % sur la parfumerie et beauté

The applicant’s detention with a view to removal was extended by two months because of her refusal to comply with the expulsion measure.

    The applicant further complains that she was deprived of her right to peaceful possession of her property because her house was destroyed and because she is not able to obtain compensation

On 2 April 2001, the prosecution closed the case because of the applicant’s death.

Localité 4] Madame [W] [U] épouse [S] [I] demeurant [Adresse 1] [Localité 5] représentés par la SCP BLIN, avoués à la Cour assistés de Me BEYNET avocat au barreau de Paris INTIMEE SCI BERAUD

On bailiffs' requests, in 2002–07 courts several times adjourned the enforcement because the applicant had refused the command's offers, and because no other flats were available. B.

  Article 8 because he was not allowed to help his sick sister.   Article 10 because he was not allowed to listen to radio programmes of his choice in prison.

On 13 December 2023 the prosecutor’s office closed the investigation against the applicant because of lack of evidence that he committed the offences.

Whereas the Amsterdam Regional Court acquitted the applicant of complicity in manslaughter because there was no conclusive technical evidence available and it therefore mainly came down to witness X’s

After the proceedings had been discontinued because of the absolute time-bar, the State restored the car in the possession of the applicant, as the “perpetrator of the crime” ( му се враќа на сторителот

The applicants appealed against the above judgment submitting that: (1)   the penalty in the form of the removal of the online article was not prescribed by law because it was not included in the

PRIS EN SES DEUX BRANCHES : VU L'ARTICLE 99 DE LA LOI DU 13 JUILLET 1967; ATTENDU QUE LES SYNDICS DE LA SOCIETE ANONYME FRANCAISE DE REPRESENTATION (SAFR), EN REGLEMENT JUDICIAIRE, ONT DEMANDE QUE BERAUD