They were each sentenced to a fine of 5,000   Danish   kroner (DKK) (approximately 670   euros   (EUR)).

By judgment of 6 May 1999, the Supreme Court ( Højesteret) found for the applicant and awarded him damages in the amount of 200,000 Danish kroner (DKK).

the papaya fruits had been delivered on 24 October 1994, PL had informed the applicant that the diamonds had arrived safely and that PL had sold them for a profit amounting to 500,000   Danish kroner

Ireland judgment of 26 May 1994, Series   A no. 290, p. 19, para. 49, and the Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands judgment of 27 October 1994, Series A no. 297-C, p. 56, para.   31).

14-20 §§, fiska         i enskilt vatten med metspö, kastspö, pilk och liknande         handredskap som är utrustat med lina och krok

The applicants were each sentenced to 20   day-fines of 400 Danish kroner (DKK) (or in the alternative 20 days' imprisonment) and ordered to pay compensation to the estate of the deceased Chief Superintendent

the papaya fruits had been delivered on 24 October 1994, PL had informed the applicant that the diamonds had well arrived and that PL had sold them with a profit amounting to 500,000   Danish kroner

borderline to what would warrant a non ‑ suspended sentence and being in doubt therefore, decided to impose a suspended sentence of sixty days’ imprisonment and a fine of 3,000   Norwegian kroner

Government’s argument that they did not fulfil the statutory conditions in that only those tenants who had acquired a “specially protected tenancy” or an “occupancy right” ( stanovanjska pravica – see Berger-Krall

Ireland , 26 May 1994, § 49, Series   A no. 290; Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands , 27 October 1994, §   31, Series A no. 297-C; and Broniowski v.

Ministry of Social Affairs and Health proposed in a note to Parliament that divers who had experienced permanent damage to their health should be awarded an amount of up to 200,000   Norwegian kroner

    By judgment of 22 November 2006 the Oslo District Court found for the applicants and ordered the magazine to pay them each 50,000   Norwegian kroner (NOK).

Ireland , 26 May 1994, § 44, Series A no. 290; Kroon and Others v. the Netherlands , 27 October 1994, §   30, Series A no. 297 ‑ C; X, Y and Z v. the United Kingdom , 22 April 1997, § 36, Reports

He received 5,000 Danish kroner for his participation in these interviews. 14.

    On 9 March 2006 L.’s lawyers requested the applicant company to remove the offensive comments and claimed 500,000 kroons (EEK) (approximately 32,000 euros (EUR)) in compensation for non-pecuniary

Court ( Retten i Roskilde ), claiming that the State Administration should acknowledge having violated his rights under Article   3 of the Convention and therefore pay him 50,000   Danish Kroner

The applicant was ordered to pay 1,178 kroons (EEK) (75 euros (EUR)) to the public purse and perform eighty hours of community service.

convicted the applicant (and its parent company) for breach of Article   114 e, in conjunction with Articles 114, 114a, 114b, 114c, and 114d, and sentenced it to 40 day-fines of 65,000 Danish Kroner

    On 9 March 2006 L.’s lawyers requested the applicant company to remove the offensive comments and claimed 500,000 Estonian kroons (EEK) (approximately 32,000 euros (EUR)) in compensation

According to the agreement, BRS assumed the obligation to pay 1,000,000,000 Estonian kroons (EEK) (approximately corresponding to 64,000,000 euros (EUR)) for the shares as well as to invest at least EEK