against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 29   September 2015 as a Committee composed of:   Nebojša Vučinić, President,   Egidijus Kūris,   Stéphanie

  On 26 February 1999 the Constitutional Court made an order dissolving the DKP.

It argued that, under existing international legal instruments, the right to protection of a trade mark was secured from the date on which the application to register it was made and that it had been deprived

    The Court further notes that the first three applicants have not submitted any claims for just satisfaction and thus no award will be made in this respect. B.

They complained that students’ identities were not made anonymous for the grammar school final examinations.

It further adjudicated that no order would be made for legal costs.   11.

  On several occasions the applicants made unsuccessful attempts to gain information on the progress of the case.

There was nothing in the present case to suggest that the judges had been influenced by the statements made in the press.

to make known their opinions on the matter before the Frontier Rivers Commission had issued the restriction.

Between 1985 and 1998 Mr Léger made numerous applications for release, all of which were refused. In addition, he made several unsuccessful applications for a presidential pardon.

2018 par le Tribunal de Commerce de PONTOISE N° chambre : 4 N° Section : N° RG : 2016F00372 Expéditions exécutoires Expéditions Copies délivrées le : à : Me Michelle DERVIEUX Me Stéphanie

1966 à CASABLANCA (MAROC) ... 69300 CALUIRE-ET-CUIRE représenté par la SCP AGUIRAUD-NOUVELLET, avoués à la Cour assisté de Me Sylvain THOURET, avocat au barreau de LYON INTIMEE : Mme Stéphanie

AMUNDI IMMOBILIER HELIOS MASSY agissant en la personne de ses représentants légaux domiciliés en cette qualité au siège représentée par Me Matthieu BOCCON GIBOD de la SELARL LEXAVOUE PARIS-VERSAILLES

in time, the applicants had not made use of their right to ask him to stand down.

MACE, avocat au barreau de TOULOUSE Monsieur [N] [V] [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] Représenté par Me Stéphanie MACE, avocat au barreau de TOULOUSE Monsieur [P] [V] [Adresse 1] [Localité 6] Représenté

Hearing dates of 18 and 25 March 1996 were then proposed but neither the applicant nor the prosecution could make the first date and the applicant could not make the second date.

[T] [J] et portant sur une créance de 57 250 euros ; - Dit que la somme de 57 250 euros est un élément de l'actif de la masse successorale de [W] [CI], décédée à [Localité 27] le [Date décès 20] 2016

The marks in question were consistent with the allegations of ill-treatment made by the applicant.

for release had been made.