They stated that there had been a detention order issued against him. The first applicant asked the officers to show him a copy of the detention order. They failed to do so.

The Government says that there is a way you can obtain them. Looking at Rule   6 of the [1981 Rules] you can ask the President of the [PAT] to get you these documents.

In the meantime they had withdrawn the power of attorney from their lawyer.

The Government also commented on the particular details given by the applicants in support of their allegations that they were harassed or had been frightened of what would happen to them if they pursued

The case concerns their placement in special schools because, they allege, of their Roma origins.

They contended under Article 5 of the Convention that they had been deprived of their liberty and security due to the conduct of the security forces.

They maintained that on the same day the security forces had set fire to their houses and had taken most of the male villagers into detention.

name of the prospects we would like to contact, and they will tell us if this client belongs to Vedior or not They ask us to avoid directly contacting big clients without informing them."

The defendants then proceeded to determine the issue summarily in their own favour, without any consideration of the rights of others or any opportunity given to them to make their case known.

Under the Dublin II Regulation* they were served with a decision refusing them leave to remain together with an order to leave the country for France, the country responsible for examining their asylum

When they refused, one of the men shot the applicant at the knee, and then second knee, with an air gun.

As they wished to appeal from there to the Supreme Court, they made various attempts to contact the lawyer who had been assigned to represent them under the legal-aid scheme.

As they wished to appeal from there to the Supreme Court, they made various attempts to contact the lawyer who had been assigned to represent them under the legal-aid scheme.

When they came to the house, W.H. used to hide and her mother used to keep the children out of their way if possible.

They contended under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 that they had been deprived of their right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions since the security forces had destroyed their houses and they had

On their own admission, they had carried out a series of crimes in the south-west of England shortly following the murder.

They further complain that their custody period was unreasonably long contrary to Article 5 § 3 of the Convention.

They had told Mr Beker that it was still too early to get up as their shifts did not start until 11 a.m. Mr Beker had then left the dormitory and they had heard noises coming from the locker area.

They stated that the polythene sheet had been planted there by the police after they had been brought to the police station.

They are too many to kill. Whom you want to kill is only the cog of the machine. Even if you break the cog of the machine there are too many degenerated people out there waiting to become the cog!