The plot of land in question had been sold to V.C. by the Chişinău Municipality several months earlier.

    The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention that her right of access to a court had been violated by a failure to enforce the final judgment in her favour. 2.

However, no response has been received.

Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 20 November 2002, Having regard to the partial decision of 6 May 2003, Having deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS The applicant, Mr Joseph

to the report drawn up on 4 September 1996 by the European Commission of Human Rights, in accordance with Article 31 of the Convention, relating to the application lodged on 20 November 1992 by Mr Joseph

However, no response has been received.

However, no response has been received and the applicant has not informed the Court of his new address.

However, no response has been received.

However, no response has been received.

However, no response has been received.

However, no response has been received.

However, no response has been received.

In reply, the applicant was reminded that legal aid had been granted to him and was given an opportunity to reconsider his decision. No reply was received by the Court.

After notice of the present application had been given to the respondent Government on 18 December 2008, the applicant’s representative informed the Court on 2 February 2009 that the applicant had been

However, there has been no response.

The letter was sent back to the Court with a note from the prison where the applicant had been held indicating that he had been released from prison.

The applicants are all represented by Dr David Camilleri, Dr Mario De Marco and Dr Joseph Gatt, lawyers practicing in Valletta. A.

Joseph High street, Ħamrun, as of June 2007.

Article 31 (art. 31) of the Convention relating to the application lodged on 8 April 1991 by Ms Mathilde Elizabeth Lupker, Ms Caroline Christine van der Mandele, Mr Rudolf Paesie, Mr Franciscus Johannes Joseph

#xa0; September 1994, the applicant complained of the excessive length of certain criminal proceedings;   Whereas in its report the Commission expressed, unanimously, the opinion that there had been