The applicant’s case was very different to that of Bigaeva v. Greece (no.

private life” in the broad sense, including the right to lead a “private social life”, that is, the possibility for the individual to develop his or her social identity (see, among other authorities, Bigaeva

examination after completing her bar traineeship fell within the scope of Article 8 because it affected her personal choice as to the way she wished to pursue her professional and private life (see Bigaeva

pursue their professional activity and that there were consequential effects on the enjoyment of their right to respect for their private life within the meaning of Article 8 of the Convention (see Bigaeva

prevention of disorder” within the meaning of Article 8 § 2 of the Convention, since it concerns the regulation of the legal profession which participates in the good administration of justice (see Bigaeva

09/2019, opposite-sex operators;   Art. 13 - lack of an effective remedy in respect of restrictions on family visits 4,500   64521/19 29/11/2019 Household   Islam Magomed-Salyakhovich BIGAYEV

Russia The applicants are: 1) Ms Sina Umarova, who was born in 1940; 2) Ms Chekhag Bizayeva, who was born in 1955; 3) Ms Khadi Nurgaliyeva, who was born in 1952; 4) Ms Petimat Murtazaliyeva, who was born