Salih AKDENIZ, aged 70, who was mayor of Inkaya, and his nephew Celil Aydodgu, aged 60.

  Principal facts   The case concerns an application brought by a Turkish national, Cemil Kılıç, who was born in 1960 and is resident in Şanlıurfa.

Il ressort des pièces du dossier que M B souffre de différentes pathologies, et notamment d'une cécité partielle binoculaire, d'une hypertension oculaire, de troubles de la marche associés à un diabète

diabète de type 2 insulino-dépendantant multi-compliqué d'une artériopathie oblitérante des membres inférieurs avec amputations multiples et d'une rétinopathie diabétique sévère ayant entraîné une cécité

Belgium (application no. 45413/07) The applicant, Cecile Anakomba Yula, is a Congolese national who was born in 1972 and lives in Koekelberg (Belgium).

    On 1 January 2017 the applicant lodged an objection against the order for his pre-trial detention.

The Commission declared the application admissible on 9 January 1995.

Turkey (no. 18888/02, §§ 44-54, 12 January 2006) and in its judgment of Doğan and Others v.   Turkey (nos.   8803 ‑ 8811/02, 8813/02 and 8815-8819/02, §§ 31-35, ECHR 2004-VI).

Turkey (no. 40530/98)   Violation of Article 6 § 1 The applicant, Cemil Aydoğan, is a Turkish national who was born in 1954 and lives in Mardin (Turkey).

On 20 January 1996 the Commission allowed Abdülmecit İlhan to continue the application on behalf of his deceased father.

Lithuania , no. 6383/17, §§   223-225, 16   January 2024 and the case-law cited therein)? (b)     based on any extradition proceedings?

  Cecil Altman & Co., Solicitors, London.

The applicants Yunis Aydemir and Cemil Aksu suffered burns in the fire.

Minister of the Interior and the Minister of Foreign Affairs, who are both defendants in the proceedings concerning the embezzlement of 1 trillion liras from the Refah Party, the Minister of Justice, Cemil

    On 1 August 1997 and 16 January 1998 respectively, the Tirana Court of Appeal and the Civil Division of the Supreme Court rejected the applicants’ appeals as ill-founded. 2.

The decision was published on 27 January 1993 and therefore these clauses ceased to have effect as of 27 July 1993.

Another person, Cemil   Garipkuş (C.G.), was also arrested at the same time.   The applicant states this was not the first occasion on which her husband was arrested.

In a further statement of 22 January 1997, this muhtar also said that during his term of office two or three persons had gone missing. 25.

    On 24 January 2017 the Oslo City Court decided in favour of the lessees.

Subsequently, on 23 December 2005 the Ministry of Justice had paid him the sum of 225,791   Turkish   liras (TRY, approximately 141,000   euros (EUR) at the time) and on 6 January 2006 the