The first applicant is owner, captain and mechanic of a fishing ship named “LUISA” and the second and third applicants are members of its crew.

Such applications had to be submitted to the vessel’s captain. On the same ground the border guards refused to allow the applicants to disembark.

    It follows that the Government’s preliminary objection on the ground of non-exhaustion cannot be accepted. 12.

He also persuaded one of the captains of that flight to carry for him a package, allegedly containing cutlery.

The ship’s captain informed the Cypriot authorities in January 2003 that the group created problems by disobeying orders and drinking alcohol almost every evening.

Dzamashvili, of the Ministry of Justice; the parties’ observations; Having deliberated, decides as follows: SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE 1.

  Following, among other things, an interview with the newspaper Libération , published in an article entitled “Gendarmerie captain slams vagueness of crime figures: ‘Temptation to cheat’”, on 4 February

Spain (application no. 12050/ 04)   THE BAIL SET FOR THE RELEASE OF THE CAPTAIN OF A SHIP WHICH CAUSED AN ECOLOGICAL DISASTER WAS NOT EXCESSIVE   By a majority :   No violation of Article

The Administrative Council appointed Captain İrfan Odabaş as inspector for the investigation into the applicant's allegations that his brother had been taken into detention by gendarmerie captain İzzet

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.   A.

  The circumstances of the case     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

On 8 October 1996 at 2.00 p.m. a captain from Lice came to the village accompanied by 70 soldiers. The captain inquired about the circumstances of the applicant’s wife’s death.

    The Code of Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation provided as follows, at the relevant time: Article 19.4 Failure to follow the lawful order of a public officer of a body exercising

:   THE FACTS           The facts of the case, as they appear from the applicant's submissions, may be summarised as follows.

In this decision it referred to statements given by the alleged perpetrators, including the battalion commander Ch., deputy commanding officer major A., captain K., lieutenant S., captain Kar., warrant

In particular, she submitted as follows: “...

He refused to comply with a lawful request by Captain S. ..., behaved aggressively, pushed S. away and attempted to leave.

Their version of the events could be summarised as follows. 18 .

       The facts of the present case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.