The Court noted that, following the birth of a child with a disability not detected during pregnancy on account of negligence in carrying out a prenatal diagnosis, the applicants had brought an action

She also complained that the purpose of the public care order was to indoctrinate her children and not to allow her to keep them in a Christian private school.

In this connection, the Court of Cassation noted finally that it was not the senior deputy Van de Walle who had replied to the covering note. II. THE RELEVANT LEGISLATION AND PRACTICE A.

    As to the present case the Court notes that the impugned decision was served on the applicant’s mother and not the applicant personally.

The Court notes that the applicant had the opportunity to examine the prosecution witnesses that appeared before the courts. It is true that the State-appointed Mufti was called but did not appear.

The applicant lastly contends that his conviction was not necessary in a democratic society. He points out that the Christians and Jews in Greece have the right to elect their religious leaders.

This will not mean, however, that those persons will not be able to work in the Republic of Moldova.

    The Court notes that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention.

Finally, as regards the applicant’s complaint that he was tried in other towns than Xanthi, the Court notes that the applicant did not show that this fact caused real difficulties to his defence team.

It noted that according to SS. 20 b para. 2 of the Composition with Creditors Act no remedy was available against the permission to terminate contracts of employment.   11.

In these conditions I could not fulfil my objectives and I could not earn my full salary. Consequently I had to leave my job after twenty-two years of work.”

Does not bind the Court.

    Even if, as suggested by the Government, the applicants dissolved their marriage immediately after the introduction of the application, in May 2010, the Court notes that they had not been

He did not recall the other visit.

According to them, Father L., an Orthodox Christian priest, arrived and began to shout at them.

was a victim but not forty-seven other applicants who stated they would have participated in the demonstration).

It further ruled that the applicant should not be provisionally released. 15.

    At the first hearing the court noted that the applicant had not paid the statutory court fee and ordered the payment of ROL 6,145,000 (EUR 250).

    If the perpetrator of a punishable act is not prosecuted, or if the prosecution is not pursued to a conclusion, then anyone with a direct interest ( rechtstreeks belanghebbende ) may lodge