CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1024JUD004118702
24 octobre 2006
This provision applies to disputes of a “genuine and serious nature” concerning the actual existence of a right as well as to the scope or manner in which it is exercised ( Benthem v. the Netherlands ,
Page 4 sur 4
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0515REP001093084
15 mai 1986
that claim to a tribunal meeting the requirements of Article 6 para. 1 (Art. 6-1) (see Eur.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0707JUD001087384
7 juillet 1989
In the course of the hearing and in the light of the evidence presented, the prosecution reduced the scope of the charges it had originally brought on 23 February 1983.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0307DEC002598794
7 mars 1996
by the applicants, within the scope of Section 2 third sentence of that Act.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1201DEC002230193
1 décembre 1993
Court H.R., Benthem judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no.97, p. 16 para. 36).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1023DEC003572497
23 octobre 2001
These criteria apply to claims against private persons as well as claims against public bodies. The leading case is Caparo Industries v. Dickman ([1990] 2 AC 605).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0411REP001221386
11 avril 1989
The Government submit that this complaint falls outside the scope of Article 6 (Art. 6).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0516DEC002372894
16 mai 1995
Court H.R., Benthem judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, p. 14, para. 32).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1015DEC001958992
15 octobre 1993
Benthem (cf. Eur.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1201DEC001816891
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1014REP001526989
14 octobre 1991
Court H.R., Benthem judgment of 23 October 1985, Series A no. 97, pp. 14-15, para. 32). 60.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC000976509
17 septembre 2013
There remained the claim for damages.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1027JUD001042683
27 octobre 1987
(b) The "contestation" (dispute) may relate not only to the actual existence of a right but also to its scope or the manner in which it may be exercised.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1208REP001153385
8 décembre 1987
Consequently, the Government maintain that the complaint falls outside the scope of the Convention. 58.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1119DEC005249911
19 novembre 2019
Subsequently, the domestic courts at three instances examined and dismissed her claim. 43.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0618DEC004712299
18 juin 2002
The setting off of commitments against payment claims is being described as ‘the removal from the balance sheet’ ( balansverkorting ).
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1015REP001394288
15 octobre 1991
The European Court of Human Rights has so far not dealt with the issue whether the request to exercise the medical profession falls under the scope of Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1130JUD000895080
30 novembre 1987
He was acquitted by the Antwerp Criminal Court on 19 January 1968 and made an unsuccessful claim for compensation. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0810JUD004047698
10 août 2006
The “contestation” (dispute), which may concern both questions of fact and questions of law, may relate not only to the actual existence of a right, but also to its scope or the manner in which it may
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0316REP001130984
16 mars 1989
Such decisions fall outside the scope of Article 6. This view is consistent with the wording of the text and supported by the travaux préparatoires.