France (application no. 42270/98) The applicant, Didier Frangy, is a French national who was born in 1958 and lives in Aspremont (France).

The letter expressly stated that if there was no reply the Court might infer that he did not intend to pursue his application and decide to strike the case out of its list.

John-Sylvanus DAGNON (TOQUE 41) avocat au barreau de GUADELOUPE) AGS CGEA DE FORT DE FRANCE Lotissement Dillon Stade-10 rue des Arts et Métiers 97200 FORT DE FRANCE (MARTINIQUE) Représenté par Me Isabelle WERTER-FILLOIS

dont le siège de la liquidation est [Adresse 5] [Adresse 4] [Localité 7] N° SIREN : 820 538 817 agissant poursuites et diligences de son liquidateur amiable y domicilié Représentée par Me Jean-Didier

exigence; que si certaines d'entre elles confirment qu'il est parfois sollicité durant ses heures de repos, les seules pièces probantes portent sur ses conditions de travail au sein des bases-vies "West

Dinis, a lawyer practising in Porto. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. 1.

FRANCAISE COMMERCIALE ANTILLES GUYANE Direction Générale-Grand Camp-La Rocade BP 13 97139 LES ABYMES Représentée par Maître BERTE & ASSOCIES, avocat au barreau de Fort de France substituée par Maître WERTER-FILLOIS

    The Government did not challenge the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment. 17.

    Thus the Conseil d’Etat did not accept that a disabled child was entitled to compensation on the sole ground that the disability had not been detected during the mother’s pregnancy.

I did not see uncle İsmail at home. He used to visit us sometimes. I was living with my mother. Afterwards, the police officers took me to my room.

The İzmir Assize Court did not mention the first two medical reports drawn up on 7 and 8 March 1999 but simply quoted a paragraph of the findings of the report drawn up on 30 July 1999. 21.

After leaving the police station a few hours later, the applicant went to have his alcohol level tested at a hospital and the results were negative.

Furthermore, regard being had to the particular circumstances of the case and to the reasoning that had led it to find a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, the Court did not consider it necessary

Didier, Geoffroy, André KN..., demeurant à Paris (16e), ..., 77°/ M. Werner, Helmut XG..., demeurant à 8000 Munich (RFA), 8, Benediktenwanstrasse, 78°/ M. NA..., Joseph G...

    In their observations the Government did not challenge the allegations as presented by the applicants.

Didier-Courbin , Deputy Director responsible for     disabled persons, General Social Action     Department, Ministry of Health, Mrs   J.

The first-instance court did not give any reason for its decision. 19.

    On 4 March 2017 the applicant went to Guba to attend a funeral ceremony. Afterwards, the applicant, together with others, visited their friend, T.A., at his private house.

(“ Əslində müqəddəs kitab nəyi öyrədir ”), were permitted for import by the State Committee for Work with Religious Associations ( Dini Qurumlarla İş Üzrə Dövlət Komitəsi – hereinafter referred to as “