AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-208400
4 février 2021
4 février 2021
FIFTH SECTION Application no. 31338/14 Maryna Oleksiyivna MAMINASHVILI and YUPITER, PP against Ukraine lodged on 10 April 2014 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application was lodged to the Court by a privately
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-244313
25 juin 2025
25 juin 2025
alleged breaches of the applicant’s right to respect for private life under Article 8 of the Convention on account of a purportedly flawed analysis by the domestic courts of her allegations that two privately
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-234428
23 mai 2024
23 mai 2024
They had accused each other of causing minor bodily harm to the other, which is a privately prosecutable offence in domestic law.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0402JUD003437313
2 avril 2015
2 avril 2015
20310/02, 31 March 2009), and cases decided by the domestic Constitutional Court such as The Police vs Alvin Privitera of 11 April 2011 and The Police vs Esron Pullicino of 12 April 2011.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-180993
22 janvier 2018
22 janvier 2018
Does the applicant have at his disposal an effective domestic remedy as required by Article 13 of the Convection to complain about inability to communicate privately with his lawyer by telephone
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-248474
13 janvier 2026
13 janvier 2026
sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Publié le 2 février 2026 PREMIÈRE SECTION Requête n o 33040/24 Alessio PRIVITERA
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-235980
30 août 2024
30 août 2024
Criminal proceedings were opened into her complaint but, in a decision of 13 February 2019, the competent district prosecutor suspended the these proceedings, finding that only a privately prosecutable
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0511DEC003205696
11 mai 1999
11 mai 1999
On an unspecified date the lawyer again requested the prosecutor for permission to see the applicant privately in prison.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-160645
12 janvier 2016
12 janvier 2016
Mr Becchetti is also the owner of Agon Channel, a privately owned television channel broadcasting in Albania and Italy.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-170896
12 janvier 2017
12 janvier 2017
The court held, in substance, that the land at issue was in the coastal zone and as such, pursuant to section 4 of the Coastal Zone Act, was owned by the State, and therefore could not be privately owned
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2656615-2900970
5 mars 2009
5 mars 2009
The authorities decided not to open an official investigation into the matter as they found that the acts complained of represented an offence for which prosecution had to be brought privately by the victim
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-168328
12 octobre 2016
12 octobre 2016
Minor bodily harm was privately prosecuted (Article 178 § 4 of the Code). The prosecution was thus brought directly by the victim of the offence and not by the public prosecutor. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9191
26 novembre 2013
26 novembre 2013
obligations Inability to claim additional compensation in respect of depreciation of compensation award through inflation: inadmissible Facts – The applicant obtained a judgment debt against a privately
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4523
20 janvier 2004
20 janvier 2004
20.1.2004 [Section IV] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Noise nuisance from light aircraft at a private aerodrome: inadmissible Facts : The applicants live in the immediate vicinity of a privately
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1109DEC004678507
9 novembre 2010
9 novembre 2010
October 2007, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The application was lodged by Kométa 99 Zrt., a privately
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3704
11 octobre 2005
11 octobre 2005
It was successful at first instance on the ground that the applicants’ land was located on the shoreline and, under domestic law, could not be privately acquired.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622DEC001663904
22 juin 2010
22 juin 2010
Ukrainian national who was born in 1958 and resides in Donetsk, Ukraine (“the first applicant”), TOV Donsplav (“the second applicant”) and DP Tekhnoskrap of TOV Skrap (“the third applicant”), the privately
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-243207
22 avril 2025
22 avril 2025
Specifically, what was the established domestic legal practice at the material time regarding the examination of disputes of a similar nature – namely, student dismissal from privately run
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2437
6 novembre 2007
6 novembre 2007
Poland - 22531/05 Judgment 6.11.2007 [Section IV] Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Refusal to expropriate privately-owned land used as public
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-203961
25 juin 2020
25 juin 2020
QUESTION TO THE PARTIES In view of judge D.F.’s involvement in the conviction of B.Š. for a criminal offence (in which the applicant had allegedly participated) and her subsequent privately initiated
Source officiellePage 4 sur 47