CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

927 résultats pour « Privitello »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-208400

Admin. suprême

4 février 2021

4 février 2021

FIFTH SECTION Application no. 31338/14 Maryna Oleksiyivna MAMINASHVILI and YUPITER, PP against Ukraine lodged on 10 April 2014 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application was lodged to the Court by a privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-244313

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2025

25 juin 2025

alleged breaches of the applicant’s right to respect for private life under Article 8 of the Convention on account of a purportedly flawed analysis by the domestic courts of her allegations that two privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-234428

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2024

23 mai 2024

They had accused each other of causing minor bodily harm to the other, which is a privately prosecutable offence in domestic law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0402JUD003437313

Admin. suprême

2 avril 2015

2 avril 2015

  20310/02, 31 March 2009), and cases decided by the domestic Constitutional Court such as The Police vs Alvin Privitera of 11   April 2011 and The Police vs Esron Pullicino of 12 April 2011.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-180993

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2018

22 janvier 2018

    Does the applicant have at his disposal an effective domestic remedy as required by Article 13 of the Convection to complain about inability to communicate privately with his lawyer by telephone

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CEDH:001-248474

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2026

13 janvier 2026

sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } .sA1D3DA2E { margin-top:0pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:justify } Publié le 2 février 2026   PREMIÈRE SECTION Requête n o 33040/24 Alessio PRIVITERA

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-235980

Admin. suprême

30 août 2024

30 août 2024

Criminal proceedings were opened into her complaint but, in a decision of 13 February 2019, the competent district prosecutor suspended the these proceedings, finding that only a privately prosecutable

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0511DEC003205696

Admin. suprême

11 mai 1999

11 mai 1999

      On an unspecified date the lawyer again requested the prosecutor for permission to see the applicant privately in prison.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-160645

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2016

12 janvier 2016

Mr Becchetti is also the owner of Agon Channel, a privately owned television channel broadcasting in Albania and Italy.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-170896

Admin. suprême

12 janvier 2017

12 janvier 2017

The court held, in substance, that the land at issue was in the coastal zone and as such, pursuant to section 4 of the Coastal Zone Act, was owned by the State, and therefore could not be privately owned

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2656615-2900970

Admin. suprême

5 mars 2009

5 mars 2009

The authorities decided not to open an official investigation into the matter as they found that the acts complained of represented an offence for which prosecution had to be brought privately by the victim

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-168328

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2016

12 octobre 2016

Minor bodily harm was privately prosecuted (Article 178 § 4 of the Code). The prosecution was thus brought directly by the victim of the offence and not by the public prosecutor. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9191

Admin. suprême

26 novembre 2013

26 novembre 2013

obligations Inability to claim additional compensation in respect of depreciation of compensation award through inflation: inadmissible   Facts – The applicant obtained a judgment debt against a privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4523

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2004

20 janvier 2004

20.1.2004 [Section IV] Article 8 Article 8-1 Respect for private life Noise nuisance from light aircraft at a private aerodrome: inadmissible Facts : The applicants live in the immediate vicinity of a privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1109DEC004678507

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2010

9 novembre 2010

October 2007, Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case, Having deliberated, decides as follows: PROCEDURE The application was lodged by Kométa 99 Zrt., a privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-3704

Admin. suprême

11 octobre 2005

11 octobre 2005

It was successful at first instance on the ground that the applicants’ land was located on the shoreline and, under domestic law, could not be privately acquired.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622DEC001663904

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2010

22 juin 2010

Ukrainian national who was born in 1958 and resides in Donetsk, Ukraine (“the first applicant”), TOV Donsplav (“the second applicant”) and DP   Tekhnoskrap of TOV Skrap (“the third applicant”), the privately

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243207

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2025

22 avril 2025

    Specifically, what was the established domestic legal practice at the material time regarding the examination of disputes of a similar nature – namely, student dismissal from privately run

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2437

Admin. suprême

6 novembre 2007

6 novembre 2007

Poland - 22531/05 Judgment 6.11.2007 [Section IV] Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Refusal to expropriate privately-owned land used as public

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-203961

Admin. suprême

25 juin 2020

25 juin 2020

  QUESTION TO THE PARTIES In view of judge D.F.’s involvement in the conviction of B.Š. for a criminal offence (in which the applicant had allegedly participated) and her subsequent privately initiated

Source officielle

Page 4 sur 47

← PrécédentSuivant →