On the same day, criminal proceedings were instituted against her concerning her use of a forged passport and she was placed in a pre-trial detention.

    Repetitive case   In the following case the Court has reached the same findings as in similar cases raising the same issues under the Convention:     Violation of Article 1

According to the applicant, the proceedings had by then already lasted for six years and three months and were still pending for execution. 16.

Article 5(3) – The applicant’s pre-trial detention had lasted for over two years and three months.

Therefore, the proceedings at issue lasted eight years and six months.

His suspended sentence was reduced to nine months’ imprisonment with the same period of probation. 10.

The same observation applies, a fortiori , to the Convention and the Rules of Court (see Miroļubovs , cited above, § 66). 11.

  In its report transmitted to the Committee of Ministers on 29 April   1970, the Commission expressed the opinion:   - by eleven votes to one that the applicant's detention lasted beyond

At the same time, there was no certainty as to whether the policemen had been able to avoid the collision.

Ultimately, in December 2006, the case was discontinued on the ground that it was prohibited to repeat charges against the same person for the same offence.

At the same time, it transferred the official liability claim to the competent bench. On 22 September 2006 the Budapest Regional Court dismissed the applicants' official liability claim.

He also complained that the administrative criminal proceedings had lasted unreasonably long. 3.

    In a subsequent appeal the applicant did not raise the issue of his being tried twice for the same offence.

On the same day the Office of Immigration and Nationality commenced asylum proceedings.

The court found that the proceedings had lasted an exceptionally long time and that they were expected to last several more years before a final judgment was given.

Safi (Malta).

  THE LAW     The applicant complains that the proceedings concerning his action lasted unreasonably long.

  Decision of the Court   Article 8 and Article 14   The Court noted that, since 2005, the Registration of Same Sex Civil Partnership Act gave the right to succeed to a tenancy to a same-sex

15 days: 150,000 pesetas; (iii)   to persons whose injuries lasted between 16 and 30 days: 300,000 pesetas; (iv)   to persons whose injuries lasted between 31 and 60 days: 600,000 pesetas; (

He submitted that the proceedings lasted for more than seven years prior to 1 January 2007 and were partly finally resolved on 9 February 2006, when the court decided on his main claim.