17/02/2015 20513/11 Georgia CHAÏNI-KONSTANTINIDI 17/02/2015 7834/11 Dimitrios CHALKIDIS 17/02/2015 1147/10+ Sokratis CHASIRTZOGLOU and Asterios MATAFTSIS AND 2 OTHER APPLICATIONS 22/09/2015 71494/14 Yousef

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 19 octobre 2023 au tribunal administratif de Versailles, Mme B A, représentée par Me Jamil Youness, demande au tribunal : 1°) d'annuler

prénom Fatma bent AMMAR ben C... ben AHMED ben ALI âgée de 5 ans en 1891 (elle serait donc née en 1886) observations : Nom substitu de celui de « CHIKH décision de Mr le Gouverneur gal. en date du 20

A D, représenté par Me Ben Ammar, demande au tribunal d'annuler l'arrêté du 16 décembre 2021 par lequel le préfet de la Seine-Saint-Denis a refusé de lui délivrer un titre de séjour, l'a obligé à quitter

During the investigation, X. started sending the applicant threatening texts, such as "prepare yourself to go to prison", "I   see you did not understand the signal", "I will place you in a detention

No first instance decision has been rendered yet.

have been received in the meantime.

* * * FAITS ET PROCEDURE Monsieur Youssef Y..., salarié de la Société BEC FRERES a été victime d'un accident le 17 février 2005.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

The police searched the applicant and seized several leaflets from a batch (entitled “Trust yourself, not the authorities”, “The Government – to be dissolved”, and “A call to the police”) that the applicant

    Rule 43 § 4 of the Rules of Court provides:   “When an application has been struck out, the costs shall be at the discretion of the Court. ...” 18.

Later during the same day, the President of the Chamber to which the case had been allocated decided to indicate to the Government, under Rule   39, that the applicants should not be deported to Eritrea

D' EXPLOITATION L' ORPHIEC/BEN YOUSSEFAD/CC COUR D'APPEL DE MONTPELLIERCHAMBRE SOCIALEARRET DU 01 OCTOBRE 2002APPELANTE :S.A.R.L.

  Bem.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

quashed and that the case be remitted for review.

  No shortcoming could therefore be attributed to the French State and the difference in treatment could not be regarded as discriminatory.

    Rule 43 § 4 of the Rules of Court provides: “When an application has been struck out, the costs shall be at the discretion of the Court. ...” 29.

According to the applicants, there were no beds there and when they asked whether they would sleep there, they were told that they would be taken elsewhere.

Mme B épouse A, de nationalité algérienne, née le 2 mars 1985 à Beni-Mouhli (Algérie), est entrée en France le 8 décembre 2017 munie d'un visa de court séjour valide jusqu'au 22 janvier 2018.