Gallen granted him a provisional permit to stay with his wife during pending criminal proceedings against him.

It was decided not to change the preventive measure imposed on him.

On 10 July 2006 the Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv extended his police custody to ten days with a view to obtaining information on his personality.

The complaint was registered by the same officer as had registered the previous complaint against him. The applicant unsuccessfully appealed against his detention.

According to the applicant, police officers punched and kicked him when he was being questioned and employed various methods of sensory deprivation to force him to make self-incriminating statements.

K. consented to the applicant’s living in the flat and had him registered him there as his grandson. In 1995 Mr V., Ms M.K.’s son, was also registered at the flat, but never lived there.

They handcuffed him with his hands behind his back, dragged him towards a police car, and banged his head against a metal gate owned by a neighbour, M.V. 2.     The Government 8.

  The father screamed at the applicant, tried to hit him with his stick and uttered threats.   The applicant's wife called the police.

and his family’s standard of living”) might apply to a court and ask to appoint him a defence counsel.

As he did not pay the fine, his passport was taken by a customs officer and not returned to him.

The applicant claims that there is no direct public transportation from Miercurea ‑ Ciuc to Bârcea Mare and that his family stopped visiting him or sending parcels with food.

  The applicant is of the opinion that the combination of his above complaints amounted to denying him any appeal at all.

The interrogative officers demanded him to confess yet again. Having faced the refusal, the applicant had his arms handcuffed and twisted behind his back.

He hit the applicant on the forearms to make him drop the piece of glass. Then he kicked him into the toilet and started hitting his waist with the truncheons.

In addition to the above, the officers also repeatedly hit the applicant on the head with a thick file folder, threatened to prosecute his relatives and spat in his face.

In his appeal the applicant also complained that, when sentencing him to administrative detention, the first-instance court had failed to take into consideration the fact that he had a second-degree disability

He complained, in particular, that the criminal case against him had been fabricated because of his journalistic activities.

It noted that, during the four years after the divorce, the applicant had had no contact with his son except for sending him letters. In 2010 the applicant had exercised his contact rights.

He submitted a Nigerian passport, issued on 16 April 2009, containing this information and a picture of him, and explained that he had not used his passport and his real identity when initially applying

After a guardian refused to admit him to the meeting, the applicant called the police and complained about the breach of his right to be present at the meeting.