The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. The applicant came to Denmark in October 1992 and applied for asylum.

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE CHARTRES N° RG 23/01183 - N° Portalis DBXV-W-B7H-F76R Minute : 25/ JCP Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : Maître Mathieu KARM de la SCP MERY -

The Court of Cassation dismissed their appeals.

The situation in Somalia for asylum seekers, whether or not they belonged to the Ashraf population group, was not such that the mere fact that a person came from that country was sufficient for refugee

  This applied to both public care and alternative care.

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant company, may be summarised as follows.

The confiscation became final with the judgment of the Court of Cassation no. 4305 of 2 February 2016. The complaints raised in each application are indicated in the appended table.

Judge I.C.B. decided to reject this request as there was no legal provision that provided for the ceasing of the preventive measure in the applicants’ case.

SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU QUE LA SARL LES GRANDS CAFES D'AVIGNON FAIT GRIEF A L'ARRET ATTAQUE D'AVOIR DECIDE QUE SON ASSOCIE TOULOUSE DEVAIT ETRE AFFILIE AU REGIME GENERAL DE LA SECURITE SOCIALE POUR

    This decision came into force on 9 March 2004. It is not clear from the case-file whether this judgment has been enforced. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 29.

The mere possibility that a person’s good reputation had been called into question entitled anybody to defend it.

Accordingly, the mere presence of the applicant’s lawyer in the hearing room could not be considered to have been sufficient by Convention standards. Conclusion : violation (five votes to two).

In particular: -     Was the interference in the present case “prescribed by law”?

against Türkiye The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 7   May 2026 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphane Pisani , President ,   Juha Lavapuro,   Hugh Mercer

against Türkiye The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 4   December 2025 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphane Pisani , President ,   Juha Lavapuro,   Hugh Mercer

As the applicant did not do so, the case was discontinued.

The applicant’s attention was drawn to Article   37 §   1   (a) of the Convention, which provides that the Court may strike an application out of its list of cases where the circumstances

BALTACI against Türkiye The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 9 April 2026 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphane Pisani , President ,   Juha Lavapuro,   Hugh Mercer

against Türkiye The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 9   April 2026 as a Committee composed of:   Stéphane Pisani , President ,   Juha Lavapuro,   Hugh Mercer