CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0210JUD004195704
10 février 2009
The domestic courts could also have fixed firm time-limits for the authorities’ submission of requested documents and expert opinions (see, Rachevi v. Bulgaria , no.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-120352
6 mai 2013
On 1 July 2009 the Constitutional Court rejected the applicants’ complaint as being inadmissible.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0421DEC005781213
21 avril 2015
He established that the tooth found on A’s body did not belong to any of the suspects.
Rétention_recoursJLD
69e85b43cdc6046d4719262c
21 avril 2026
déci TJ [Localité 1] 19 avril 2026 [Adresse 1] C/ [E] COUR D'APPEL DE NÎMES Cabinet du Premier Président Ordonnance du 21 AVRIL 2026 Nous, Mme Alexandra BERGER
CHAMBRE 02
69ded31fcdc6046d4741e701
19 décembre 2025
[O] [I] un contrat de location avec option d'achat, portant sur le financement d'un véhicule Mercédès de type classe E Berline [Localité 1] Sportline 220D BA immatriculée [Immatriculation 1].
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000561413
24 juillet 2014
Besides, as a member of the ethnic Uzbek community, which was being persecuted and discriminated against, he would, if extradited, be subjected to torture or degrading treatment.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1214JUD005597416
14 décembre 2021
The police declined to investigate her reports on the grounds that the threats had not reached the threshold of being “real” and that an offence of “battery” was subject to private prosecution.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0111JUD007050213
11 janvier 2018
Clause 4 spoke of the protection of Macedonians subjected to racial and ethnic assimilation by the Bulgarian State’s nationalistic policies and demanded that Pirin Macedonia be given cultural autonomy,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0220JUD005288409
20 février 2020
Moreover, liturgical rites in traditional Christian churches are criticised and portrayed as being contrary to the Bible.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1219JUD002045214
19 décembre 2018
It therefore considered itself bound by the Court of Cassation’s judgment of 7 October 2013 and could not overrule it, thus being unable to allow a request by the applicant to seek a preliminary ruling
11e chambre
5fca9f3243dfd19523e5af21
9 juillet 2020
en conséquence : - constater le caractère injustifié des demandes de rappel de salaire formulées.
5fca9f3243dfd19523e5af22
5fca9f3243dfd19523e5af23
5fca9f3243dfd19523e5af24
5fca9f3243dfd19523e5af25
5fca9f3243dfd19523e5af27
5fca9f3243dfd19523e5af28
5fca9f3343dfd19523e5af29
5fca9f3343dfd19523e5af2a
5fca9f3343dfd19523e5af2b
Page 40 sur 55
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.