CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

28 196 résultats pour « Rezad »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206DEC002711708

Admin. suprême

6 décembre 2011

6 décembre 2011

He relied in substance on Article 3 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “No one shall be subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.” 20.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0519DEC003325002

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2005

19 mai 2005

The relevant part of the Act Amending the Civil Obligations Act ( Zakon o izmjeni Zakona o obveznim odnosima – Official Gazette no. 7/96; “the 1996 Amendment”) reads as follows: Section 1 “Section 180

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0524DEC006142500

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2005

24 mai 2005

Section 2 of the 2004 Act reads, in so far as relevant: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0519DEC005738500

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2005

19 mai 2005

Section 2 of the 2004 Act reads, in so far as relevant: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0524DEC005974300

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2005

24 mai 2005

Section 2 of the 2004 Act reads, in so far as relevant: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0923DEC004173002

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2004

23 septembre 2004

The relevant part of the Amendments to the Act on Areas of Special State Care ( Zakon o izmjenama i dopunama zakona o područjima od posebne državne skrbi , Official Gazette no. 73/2000) reads as follows

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0822JUD002083802

Admin. suprême

22 août 2006

22 août 2006

Section 2, in so far as relevant, reads as follows: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0125DEC004702399

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2001

25 janvier 2001

Article 161 §§ 4, 5 and 7 reads as follows: “4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0313DEC003777497

Admin. suprême

13 mars 2003

13 mars 2003

The only stamp which was used to censor detainees’ correspondence, and this for security reasons, read “tutor-censored”.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0906DEC001081602

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2005

6 septembre 2005

Section 2 of the 2004 Act reads, in so far as relevant: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1118JUD000886306

Admin. suprême

18 novembre 2010

18 novembre 2010

    The relevant extracts from Chapter 40 (Appeal procedure) of the Code, as worded at the material time, read as follows: Article 302.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0329DEC003732613

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2016

29 mars 2016

rehearsals but did not read the script and (iii) the defendants who read the script but did not watch the rehearsal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0507JUD002834516

Admin. suprême

7 mai 2024

7 mai 2024

    At some point A.M. intervened by phone and complained that unlawfully intercepted conversations were being read out.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181534

Admin. suprême

13 février 2018

13 février 2018

daughter’s (represented by her mother) right under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 to vote in free elections which ensure the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature, read

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142599

Admin. suprême

26 mars 2014

26 mars 2014

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of his Convention rights on the grounds of the disability of his child, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-186353

Admin. suprême

28 août 2018

28 août 2018

In particular, the question reads as follows:   As regards the authorities’ decision invalidating the applicant’s Russian passport, has there been an interference with the applicant’s right to respect

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-145629

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2014

19 juin 2014

Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her/his Convention rights on the ground of her/his status as a remand prisoner, pending trial, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read

Source officielle
CC

soc

61372193cd580146773f4e74

Cassation

10 décembre 1991

10 décembre 1991

Abdul Reza X..., demeurant 17 bis, rue E.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1127DEC001092203

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2007

27 novembre 2007

THE LAW Article 37 of the Convention, as far as relevant, reads as follows: “1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-163408

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2016

4 mai 2016

    Relevant domestic law The relevant parts of the Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, as in force at the material time, read as follows: Article 282¹ § 1 “No [ordinary] appeal shall lie against

Source officielle

Page 40 sur 1410

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.