Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it was decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

His two colleagues were also faced with the same difficulties.

  The Federal Attorney's office refused the request on the same day, inter alia , in view of a danger of collusion.

Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. THE FACTS I.

As concerned the promissory note loan, the same type of agreement had been followed.

number, was dealt with by the same (criminal) court and by the same (criminal) judge as the substantive (criminal) proceedings, and the court could have rendered the decision concerning costs and expenses

Those proceedings lasted from 3 July 2006 to 5 January 2009 at three levels of jurisdiction.

The police inquiry lasted from 1 May until 3 June 2010.

    On the same date the investigator refused to open criminal proceedings into the applicant’s complaints that he had been beaten by police officers on 17 April 2003.

Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. 4.

  The same day, the prosecution requested that Basmanniy District Court of Moscow remand the applicant in custody.

They thus lasted 7 years, 2 months and 7 days. 17.

They thus lasted eight years and three years, respectively, involving two levels of jurisdiction. A.     Admissibility 23.

It has thus lasted for about eight years and ten months for two levels of jurisdiction. A.     Admissibility 26.

    The applicant complained that the administrative proceedings had lasted an unreasonably long time.

    Having regard to the fact that the application concern the same set of proceedings, the Court finds it appropriate to join them. II.

    By a judgment of 18 September 2003, the Nakhimovskyy Court rejected the applicant’s claim for the same reasons as in its judgment of 5   October 1999. 11.

It also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 3). THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

State raising the same complaints (applications nos.

They therefore lasted almost ten years and eight months. 21.