Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

    The applicant further complained under Article 6 § 1 that the discontinuation of disciplinary proceedings infringed his right to a fair trial, because no decisions on the merits of the cases

    The applicant alleged, in particular, that the length of the proceedings had been excessive and that his right to a fair trial had been violated as the Insurance Court had not organised an

for claiming compensation in respect of these periods, the Court cannot but observe that, as matters stand, no compensation has been paid to the applicant for any violation of his right in the first trial

reiterates that it had already found an action for damages under Article 417 of the Civil Code taken together with section 16 of the Law of 17 June 2004 on complaints about a breach of the right to a trial

The Administrative Judicial Procedure Act contains no restriction on the use of pre-trial investigation material in the consideration of a case. 22.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

The Government conceded that there had been a delay of several months between the applicant’s committal for trial and the commencement of the trial.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

    On 29 April 2003 the applicant and Mr S. were committed for trial on both charges.

The trial court found it established, on the basis of the applicant's police custody statement of 18 May 2000, that he was a member of the illegal organisation.

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial

Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial