CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

1 983 résultats pour « Alexandra HAVAS »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0915JUD001560207

Admin. suprême

15 septembre 2016

15 septembre 2016

    Thirdly, the applicant maintained that either evidence of the interception of the telephone conversation should have been disclosed to the trial judge or the trial should have been abandoned

Page 41 sur 100

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0109JUD004907211

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2014

9 janvier 2014

The Court further observes that the applicant refused to have an HIV test in 2010, which could have narrowed the window of uncertainty as to the possible time of his infection.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD004403805

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

    On 18 August 2005 the regional office of the Federal Treasury returned the writs of execution to the applicant on the ground that the military unit did not have an account there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1119DEC002491208

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2013

19 novembre 2013

2013 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia Laffranque,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127DEC003003709

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2012

27 novembre 2012

The applications have been communicated to the Government . THE LAW A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1205JUD002149712

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2013

5 décembre 2013

Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Elisabeth Steiner, President,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Ksenija Turković, judges,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127DEC003472908

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2012

27 novembre 2012

130 of the Federal Constitution ( Bundes-verfassungsgesetz ), the Administrative Court rules on, inter alia , applications ( Beschwerden ) in which it is alleged that the administrative authorities have

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0207JUD004164304

Admin. suprême

7 février 2012

7 février 2012

However, on an unspecified date he appears to have been released on bail. 13.     On 4 June 2004 the trial court considered the case against the applicant and his co-defendant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0628DEC001237505

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2011

28 juin 2011

Some of these disputes have resulted in a final decision, while others are still pending.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127DEC000213909

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2012

27 novembre 2012

The applications have been communicated to the Government . THE LAW A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0210DEC002756713

Admin. suprême

10 février 2015

10 février 2015

As the statutory requirements for issuance of the requested consent have not been met, it was decided as in the operative part of the decision.” 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0605DEC006272610

Admin. suprême

5 juin 2012

5 juin 2012

    The Court does not have to address all the issues raised by the parties, as this application is in any event inadmissible on the following grounds. 24.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1103DEC006181513

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2015

3 novembre 2015

Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 3   November 2015 as a Chamber composed of:   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President,   Päivi Hirvelä,   Ledi Bianku,   Linos-Alexandre

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC002282006

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2013

22 janvier 2013

It noted that a media offence ( Medieninhaltsdelikt ) such as this could not have been committed unless the defamatory statement had been published on the applicant company’s news website, and thus found

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0306DEC005441509

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2012

6 mars 2012

In any case, the applicants should have had the benefit of a full year after September and December 2008 respectively before they should have been aware that the investigations were ineffective (see Narin

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD000909609

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2013

27 juin 2013

Paragraph 2 confers the “right to rehabilitation” on defendants who have been acquitted, against whom charges have been dropped, in respect of whom proceedings have been discontinued or whose conviction

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0426JUD007488413

Admin. suprême

26 avril 2018

26 avril 2018

He uses crutches, as he is neither eligible to have a prosthetic limb fitted, nor does he have the necessary financial means for such a procedure. The applicant also claims to be a drug user. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0611JUD004428410

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2015

11 juin 2015

In the applicant’s view, such a decision would have become res iudicata and she would never have been able to lodge a fresh request.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0205DEC001135005

Admin. suprême

5 février 2019

5 février 2019

    The applicant, Ms Aleksandra Panteleymonovna Besetskaya, is a Russian national, who was born in 1940 and lives in Chernyanka. 2.

Source officielle
TJ

PCP JCP référé

669aaeb530bd4f0c3f6b30d3

T. Judiciaire

19 juillet 2024

19 juillet 2024

Adresse 3] Monsieur [C] [P], demeurant [Adresse 3] Monsieur [U] [K], demeurant [Adresse 3] représentés par Maître Clément VERDEIL, avocat au barreau de PARIS, vestiaire : E1474 substitué par Maître Hanna

Source officielle