CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

31 923 résultats pour « Becaud »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0113DEC005364900

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2000

13 janvier 2000

In his testimony to the police, Mr Ebigwei alleged, inter alia, that there was a risk for his life if deported to Nigeria, because he was a Christian and because of the conflict between Christians and

Source officielle

Page 41 sur 1597

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187184

Admin. suprême

29 septembre 2018

29 septembre 2018

The expert concluded, however, that V.S. had died because of acute sepsis and not because of the applicant’s actions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-184709

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2017

30 mars 2017

On 10 July 2010 the applicant called the police because her husband had beaten her.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0904DEC007513901

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2003

4 septembre 2003

The applicant submits that the eviction order was not executed because the assistance of the police had not been ensured and because of the presence in the flat of a number of war veterans who had obstructed

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1018DEC000092103

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2007

18 octobre 2007

From 14 August 2002 to 28 November 2002 the proceedings were stayed because of the applicant’s illness.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1971297-2073394

Admin. suprême

12 avril 2007

12 avril 2007

  In December 1995 the applicant was dismissed from the school because she no longer met the educational and professional requirements of her post.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0903JUD001016113

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 2015

3 septembre 2015

The judgment became final on 2 January 2008. 11.

Source officielle
CC

comm

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:CO00095

Cassation

28 février 2024

28 février 2024

Le Masne de Chermont, Mmes Comte, Bessaud, Bellino, M.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-155108

Admin. suprême

12 mai 2015

12 mai 2015

Because M.K.’s behaviour was unpredictable, he should have been under strict supervision.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0430JUD002331004

Admin. suprême

30 avril 2009

30 avril 2009

Three of them did not take place because the respondent failed to appear, one hearing was postponed because the applicant did not appear and three hearings were adjourned either because the applicant asked

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110096

Admin. suprême

10 février 2012

10 février 2012

The applicant suspected that the Iranian police had been looking for him because his friends had been tortured to disclose his name.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-153425

Admin. suprême

3 mars 2015

3 mars 2015

In conclusion the Constitutional Court found that because the institution of civil marriage was open to different-sex couples, because the institution of the registered partnership was created in order

Source officielle
CA

4ème CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE

69eb0051cdc6046d4757b5c3

Appel

23 avril 2026

23 avril 2026

déclaration d'appel en date du 20 janvier 2026, D'UNE PART ET : Madame [M] [Z] née le [Date naissance 1] 1957 à [Localité 1] (RFA), demeurant [Adresse 3] Représentée par Maître Patrick BELAUD

Source officielle
CC

soc

ECLI:FR:CCASS:2012:SO00344

Cassation

10 janvier 2012

10 janvier 2012

Béraud, conseiller, et après en avoir immédiatement délibéré conformément à la loi ; Vu l'article 462 du code de procédure civile ; Attendu qu'une erreur matérielle a été commise dans la rédaction

Source officielle
TA

Tribunal Administratif de Marseille

ORTA_2107530_20230308

Administratif

8 mars 2023

8 mars 2023

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 24 août 2021 et des pièces complémentaires enregistrées le 7 septembre 2021, Mme C A, représentée par Me Beraud, demande au tribunal d'annuler

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1926

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2008

23 septembre 2008

The applicant’s application to enrol in a faculty of theology was rejected because she did not supply an identity photograph of herself not wearing a veil, as required by the Higher Education Board rules

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1023DEC007430901

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 2003

23 octobre 2003

The Government submitted that the applicant did enjoy access to a court because he had instituted civil proceedings for damages before the Zagreb Municipal Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-215085

Admin. suprême

16 décembre 2021

16 décembre 2021

However, it concluded that the applicant had not incurred any damage because of the violation of his privacy because the distress he suffered had been related to his mental illness and to the search as

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-224234

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2023

20 mars 2023

The applicant alleged that the measures taken by the authorities interfered with his right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion protected by Article   9 of the Convention because they had

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-162986

Admin. suprême

20 avril 2016

20 avril 2016

The applicant stated that whenever he was unable to walk because of his medical condition he was not provided with a wheelchair, accessible living quarters or a person to assist him.

Source officielle