CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0301DEC003392810
1 mars 2016
recalls that in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application or part thereof under Article 37 § 1(c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government – even if the applicant wishes
Page 41 sur 154
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0927DEC003151107
27 septembre 2011
It also recalls that in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1(c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1005DEC002531307
5 octobre 2010
6ème chambre
DTA_2200586_20250304
4 mars 2025
Par deux mémoires en défense, enregistrés les 10 juillet 2024 et 28 septembre 2024, la commune d'Auribeau-sur-Siagne, représentée par Me Willm, conclut au rejet de la requête et demande, à titre reconventionnel
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0519DEC004880708
19 mai 2015
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510DEC000603808
10 mai 2011
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115DEC002334115
15 novembre 2016
reiterates that in certain circumstances, it may strike out an application under Article 37 § 1 (c) on the basis of a unilateral declaration by a respondent Government even if the applicant wishes
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1022DEC001712911
22 octobre 2013
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206DEC005069906
6 décembre 2011
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0826DEC004171006
26 août 2014
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115DEC002344515
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0620JUD002394404
20 juin 2013
The Court recalls that it has been its practice to strike applications out of the list of cases in the absence of any heir or close relative who has expressed a wish to pursue the application
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0212DEC001095808
12 février 2013
France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006 ‑ V; Majewski v. Poland , no.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1207DEC001775591
7 décembre 1994
#xa0; 17757/91 by Franz
civ1
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2015:C101433
16 décembre 2015
MOYEN ANNEXE au présent arrêt Moyen produit par la SCP Delaporte, Briard et Trichet, avocat aux Conseils, pour la société Columbus acquisitions INC et la société Columbus Holdings France Il est fait
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0118JUD001395816
18 janvier 2024
Even if they had managed to use Skype to express their wish to apply for asylum, they would not have been considered as holding the status of asylum-seekers. 17.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0912DEC002438215
12 septembre 2023
Namely, he had expressed that wish at a meeting with the ICRC at which L.A., the Ombudsperson of the Republic of Armenia, had also been present.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1015
29 mars 2010
France [GC] - 3394/03 Judgment 29.3.2010 [GC] Article 1 Jurisdiction of states Responsibility of states Territorial jurisdiction in respect of arrest of foreign vessel on high seas Article 5 Article 5-
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0629DEC002345694
29 juin 1994
Frank McDonnell, a solicitor practising in County Louth, Ireland. The facts of this case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1122JUD004813207
22 novembre 2011
France , 25 June 1996, § 36, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996 ‑ III).