both sides of his back and sensitivity under his right nipple. 10.

wound to his forehead. 8.

had relied only on the statement of one of the victims, and that it had not taken into account his disability, which excluded the possibility of his detention. 10.

consequences of his unlawful actions.

for the damage caused to his honour and dignity. 6 .

domestic remedy in respect of his complaint concerning the poor conditions of his detention.

of his child had violated, in particular, his right to respect for his family life under Article 6 of the Basic Law and Article 8 of the Convention and his right to equal treatment under Article 3 §§

His entire family lives here.

In his statement S.Š. confessed to taking part in such an operation and named three persons as his accomplices.

It is without doubt that situations can be envisaged where a detainee’s mental state or other circumstances would render his personal involvement in detention proceedings impossible.

the entire period of his detention.

On 15 February 2005 the applicant applied for an adjustment of his debts.

The applicant had not received any summons and his family had no information about his whereabouts or the reasons for his absence.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, CHAMBRE SOCIALE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par M. Hubert X..., demeurant chez M. et Mme Z... au ...

He received no response to his request.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life ... and his correspondence. 2.

He was accompanied by his chosen defence counsel and was notified of his right to remain silent and his obligation to testify truthfully, should he choose to answer questions.

It was only after his asylum application had been rejected twice that he had changed his explanation in this respect.

On that day, at his request, Ms M.D. was appointed as his counsel and took part in the pre-trial proceedings.

communicate confidentially with his lawyers.