It was also observed that most witnesses and suspects had kept refusing from making any statements.

The file relating to the present application was also seized in its entirety. 24.

The case file does not contain any document which shows that the applicant objected to the extension of his detention. Nor does the applicant make any claim that he did so.

There is also no information in the case file to show that the applicant himself lodged a complaint with the public prosecutor’s office.

    From 29 February until 21 July 2000 the applicant was kept in cell   no. 6. 26.

Filar, a lawyer practising in Tarnów. A.     The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant company, may be summarised as follows. 1.

    Par une décision du 10 avril 2013, le tribunal fit provisoirement droit à la demande du requérant.

[The detainee] shall be informed in writing and immediately of this measure and the retained correspondence shall be stored in a special file kept by the prison authorities. 5.

The documents from the criminal case file that were available to the applicant and his defence counsel at this stage of the proceedings were: the decision declaring the applicant a suspect; the arrest

Ils soutinrent que leur fils n’avait aucun problème psychologique ni aucun souci familial et qu’il n’avait aucune raison de se suicider.

After their release all four of them moved to Kyiv, where the applicant kept in touch with La., who gave him a key to his apartment. La. kept in touch with Lu. and P. 6.

On 7 October 2002 the case-file was returned to the Vladimir Regional Court. 6.

As the file had been destroyed, the Court opened a new file under the current case number and, on 25 March 2004, sent an introductory letter to the lawyer.

The court examined the evidence in the file, notably the administrative-offence report and a video recording of the relevant events. 4.

    According to the domestic case file, the prosecutor’s appeal had been notified to the applicants before the Court of Appeal heard it on 28   February 2005.

However, she did not file an action for annulment.

Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting on 11 May 2023 as a Committee composed of:   Carlo Ranzoni , President ,   Mattias Guyomar,   Mykola Gnatovskyy , judges , and Martina Keller

She had been kept on the floor while being transported to the hospital.

The Fatih Criminal Court of First Instance decided on 21   March 2006 that it did not have jurisdiction to examine the case and referred the file to the Istanbul Court of Assizes.