CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115563
4 décembre 2012
Novomoskovskiy Local Court of Dnipropetrovs’k Region (the Novomoskovskiy Court), which ordered his pre-trial detention on the ground that the applicant was accused of a crime punishable by imprisonment of more
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11297
22 novembre 2016
Turkey - 4982/07 Judgment 22.11.2016 [Section II] Article 10 Article 10-1 Freedom of expression Seizure and confiscation for more than five years of all copies of edition of a magazine containing article
ECLI:CEDH:001-145336
12 juin 2014
Addendum to the application form of 11 October 2010 The applicant complains under Article 8 of the Convention about a restriction on the number of parental visits (no more than two visits a month) and
ECLI:CEDH:002-12403
2 avril 2019
Under the Law, exceptions to the rule of adverse possession, which had previously been more limited, were now extended to all natural sites (including the land occupied by the applicant).
ECLI:CEDH:002-7308
27 novembre 2012
The applicant had asked the domestic courts on more than one occasion to pronounce the divorce in a partial judgment and to decide the other issues relating to the proceedings separately, as the domestic
ECLI:CEDH:002-942
4 mai 2010
That argument was rejected by the Irish Supreme Court, which found, inter alia , that the applicant had a remedy for the delay in the United Kingdom courts and it would be demonstrably more efficient and
ECLI:CEDH:002-5196
24 septembre 2002
Indeed, they received them more speedily since, unlike the employer, they did not have to wait for the cheque and credit card payments to be processed.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1776
2 décembre 2008
A more open interpretation had finally prevailed in the judgments delivered by the Supreme Court between 2001 and 2005.
ECLI:CEDH:002-1204
1 décembre 2009
As regards the judicial proceedings concerning custody and access, they had lasted more than four and a half years but only five hearings had been held during that time.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3656
24 novembre 2005
law in force at the material time made no exceptions to that time-limit, and thus made no allowance for husband’s in the applicant’s situation who did not become aware of the biological reality until more
ECLI:CEDH:002-3003
19 décembre 2006
telephone conversation between government officials: violation   Facts : At the relevant time the applicant company was broadcasting on five frequencies in Slovakia and had a daily audience of more
ECLI:CEDH:002-924
10 juin 2010
unreasonable or arbitrary concerning the fact that the reception of a second child, even of an age comparable to the first, would constitute an additional burden for the applicant or that problems are more
ECLI:CEDH:002-4288
1 juillet 2004
Law : Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 – It was hard to understand why there had been a delay of more than one year in drafting the obligations which arose from an order which was immediately enforceable and
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913DEC004958017
13 septembre 2018
That occasion of the applicant’s transport occurred more than six months before he lodged his application with the Court on 26 May 2017.
ECLI:CEDH:002-11219
23 juin 2016
The measures in question had pursued legitimate aims, in particular the protection of the rights of others and, with more specific reference to the interception of the police communications, the protection
ECLI:CEDH:002-574
31 mars 2011
Access to court Appeal struck out of the list because of failure to complywithfirst-instance judgment: violation   Facts – In 2006 the applicant was ordered at first instance to repay a bank loan of more
ECLI:CEDH:002-10990
12 avril 2016
However, the authorities took no significant steps for a period of almost a year and, more than five years after the initial criminal complaint, they had not yet established the identity of the perpetrators
Cour d'Appel
6253cadbbd3db21cbdd8c533
3 juillet 2008
INTIMÉ : Syndicat des copropriétaires de la résidence LA MORÉE 141/143 RUE DE MITRY & 1 RUE DES MIMOSAS 93600 AULNAY SOUS BOIS, représenté par son administrateur judiciaire, Maître Philippe BLERIOT
ECLI:CEDH:002-10479
23 avril 2015
Germany - 38030/12 Judgment 23.4.2015 [Section V] Article 8 Expulsion Proposed removal of a mentally ill person who had lived and worked in the host country for more than twenty years: expulsion would
ECLI:CEDH:002-12300
15 janvier 2019
On the other hand, even though the applicant’s injury was accidental, his presence in the non-secure area of the prison van was the result of the convoy officers’ decision to transport more detainees than
Page 41 sur 7138