The starting       point of the police's involvement in the further       investigation was usual information to the police.

The police’s apparent difficulty in arranging for the interrogation of R., the other suspect, is understandable since he did not live in Finland and failed to respond to the police.

By a decision of 27 April 1993 the Zamość Governor, at the police’s request, annulled the applicant’s passport.

    Apparently frustrated with the police’s slowness in responding to the complaint, the second applicant lodged written complaints with many other institutions.

appeal complaint on 09/02/2021; no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s

applicants sought protection against unlawful interference by the police, the Supreme Administrative Court held that it was for the prosecution authorities, not the administrative courts, to review the police’s

It follows that the domestic courts merely accepted the police’s version of events and the charges as presented in the relevant police reports without considering any other explanations, addressing the

In this connection, the Court reiterates that the police’s failure to conduct a search immediately following an arrest without good reason raises legitimate concerns about the possible “planting” of evidence

No adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s discretion), no adequate and

On 20   November   2020 the Khortytskyi District Court set aside the police’s decision of 16   October   2020 on the ground that the police had failed to comprehensively examine all

It held that media communications were not part of the investigative proceedings and that the criminal police’s media relations were not subject to control by the prosecutor.

] [L] [X] et Madame [Z] [D] épouse [X], ses parents demeurant [Adresse 1] Représentés par Me Olivier GROSSET JANIN, avocat postulant au barreau de CHAMBERY et la SELARL GUMUSCHIAN ROGUET BONZY POLZELLA

    On 18 February 2020 the Kyiv prosecutor’s office set aside the police’s decision of 27 December 2019 mainly for their failure to find and question R. and any witnesses and to order a comprehensive

Regional Court, on 17/10/2017; no adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant (objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police’s

Relying on Articles   2 (right to life) and   13 (right to an effective remedy), she alleges in particular that the police’s use of firearms against her son during the chase through the streets

    In June 1981 the applicant was convicted of wounding a policeman.   A discretionary life sentence was imposed.

  The case concerns the killing on 19 July 1996 of the applicants’ relatives, Kuncho Angelov and Kiril Petkov, both aged 21, by a military policeman who was trying to arrest them.

He was immediately transferred to a hospital and placed in the Toxicology Department in order to be guarded by the same policeman as another detainee who was undergoing a treatment there.

    The applicant was convicted in 1975 for the murder of a policeman and attempted murder of two other policemen arising out of an incident in the early hours of 6 July 1974 when, on being stopped