CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

135 322 résultats pour « Theis »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11838

Admin. suprême

1 février 2018

1 février 2018

The lawyer had continued to represent them throughout their detention and was a neighbour of the applicant’s family.

Source officielle

Page 41 sur 6767

← PrécédentSuivant →
CC

cr

6137251dcd5801467741b170

Cassation

8 février 1990

8 février 1990

défendues au nom du national-socialisme en 1939 par Hitler, qui signa le décret d'extermination des malades mentaux en Allemagne, avec les thèses défendues aujourd'hui en France 45 ans plus tard au nom

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD005299908

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2011

20 décembre 2011

If any of the jurors consider that the jury will be unable to do so, then they must tell the judge, who can then deal with the matter – by discharging the jury, if necessary.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923DEC000652312

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2014

23 septembre 2014

This deprived them of a determination of their rights under the law.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-13333

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 2021

6 juillet 2021

Although it was not the Court’s task to take the place of the domestic authorities in examining these questions, it had to satisfy itself that the domestic courts, when taking their decision, had conducted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0913JUD003520703

Admin. suprême

13 septembre 2005

13 septembre 2005

They asked the court to oblige the prosecutor to solve their problem. They also asked the court to hear the case in their presence. 46.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0630JUD003902817

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2022

30 juin 2022

They told the border guards that they could not remain in Belarus as their visas had expired, and that in practice it would be impossible for them to obtain international protection there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1127DEC002942495

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 1996

27 novembre 1996

  All accused denied having been involved in drugs and none of them gave evidence before the jury.   They claimed that they had been falsely implicated in the offences.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0504DEC005358609

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2010

4 mai 2010

They were told that even if we don't currently have three places together, if there are two in the home they want to move to we will hold the vacancies until we can move them all together.” 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1215DEC000300706

Admin. suprême

15 décembre 2009

15 décembre 2009

being held in the Sakharov Museum; they then conspired to commit disorderly acts at the exhibition.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1213DEC003045709

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2011

13 décembre 2011

They allege that their claims will not be examined – let alone rigorously examined – by the Greek authorities, and in this respect they also invoke Article 6 and Article 13 in conjunction with Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0614JUD002197407

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2011

14 juin 2011

    The loss of this opportunity was due to the applicants’ negligence as they had missed the statutory deadline, although they still had nine days within which to appeal after the judgment confirming

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0710DEC002958396

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 1997

10 juillet 1997

Moreover, it was the Government's, and not their fault, if these documents had been lost, as they were supposed to be kept in the archives of the municipality.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0904DEC003859597

Admin. suprême

4 septembre 2001

4 septembre 2001

In this respect, they submit that the applicants cannot be deemed victims of the alleged violations.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0601DEC006468401

Admin. suprême

1 juin 2004

1 juin 2004

Prosecutor was not communicated to them prior to the hearing and they had to defend themselves without adequate time to prepare their defence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-243808

Admin. suprême

19 mai 2025

19 mai 2025

However, the Fund refused to consider these documents, treating them as either incomplete or submitted too late.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1214JUD000451704

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2010

14 décembre 2010

The Kurds like the colour red; because red is the colour of the blood they have been shedding for years for their freedom.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1006DEC000937104

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2009

6 octobre 2009

On 31 October 2008 the Government submitted their observations and on 3 November 2008 informed the Court that they were interested in concluding a friendly settlement agreement.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1128DEC002317894

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 1994

28 novembre 1994

  They asked them "Where are those who came to the house in the evening ?"   The applicant's family insisted that no one had come to their house.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0221JUD000708811

Admin. suprême

21 février 2019

21 février 2019

    In October and November 2009 when the applicants were allowed to testify before the court in the criminal proceedings against them, they stated that they had been ill-treated during their

Source officielle