AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-172625
6 mars 2017
6 mars 2017
COMPLAINT The applicants complain, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, that the State’s failure to comply with an enforceable judgment rendered in their favour violated their right of access to a court
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9285
14 janvier 2014
14 janvier 2014
Since the judgments in the applicants’ favour remained partly unenforced, the situation complained of had to be considered as continuing.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC003759711
14 janvier 2014
14 janvier 2014
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in her favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC005513911
14 janvier 2014
14 janvier 2014
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC003014312
14 janvier 2014
14 janvier 2014
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in her favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC003806211
17 septembre 2013
17 septembre 2013
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC004059611
17 septembre 2013
17 septembre 2013
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in her favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC000481311
17 septembre 2013
17 septembre 2013
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC003020712
17 septembre 2013
17 septembre 2013
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC001583212
17 septembre 2013
17 septembre 2013
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-179968
14 décembre 2017
14 décembre 2017
The application concerns the criminal convictions of the applicant for disseminating propaganda in favour of the PKK, an illegal armed organisation, under section 7 § 2 of the Prevention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614DEC000152309
14 juin 2016
14 juin 2016
applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the non ‑ enforcement of a final domestic court decision rendered in his favour
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614DEC006622812
14 juin 2016
14 juin 2016
applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the non ‑ enforcement of a final domestic court decision rendered in his favour
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC000629809
15 avril 2014
15 avril 2014
1 about the prolonged non-enforcement of the domestic decisions in its favour.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2637
7 juin 2007
7 juin 2007
had not presented any proof of the intention of the State Foreign Trade Agency “Soyuzplodoimport” to convert itself into another company or to reorganise itself so as to separate from its assets in favour
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013DEC002742111
13 octobre 2015
13 octobre 2015
On 15 February 2009 the applicant chanted slogans in favour of the leader of an illegal organisation, Abdullah Öcalan. On 24 April 2009 he attended the Newroz celebration.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5458
31 janvier 2002
31 janvier 2002
He was in favour of a united democratic republic for Turkish and Greek Cypriots. On 6 July 1996, he was shot dead in front of his house in the “TRNC” by unidentified persons.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC005550212
14 janvier 2014
14 janvier 2014
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC003807711
17 septembre 2013
17 septembre 2013
The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0520DEC001015405
20 mai 2008
20 mai 2008
On 6 March 2003 the Bălţi Regional Court found in the applicant’s favour and ordered the local authorities of the Edineţ County to pay him 132,473 Moldovan lei (MDL).
Source officiellePage 42 sur 606