CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

12 110 résultats pour « Favot »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Tous
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-172625

Admin. suprême

6 mars 2017

6 mars 2017

COMPLAINT The applicants complain, under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, that the State’s failure to comply with an enforceable judgment rendered in their favour violated their right of access to a court

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9285

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2014

14 janvier 2014

Since the judgments in the applicants’ favour remained partly unenforced, the situation complained of had to be considered as continuing.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC003759711

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2014

14 janvier 2014

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in her favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC005513911

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2014

14 janvier 2014

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC003014312

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2014

14 janvier 2014

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in her favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC003806211

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC004059611

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in her favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC000481311

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC003020712

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC001583212

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179968

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 2017

14 décembre 2017

The application concerns the criminal convictions of the applicant for disseminating propaganda in favour of the PKK, an illegal armed organisation, under section   7 §   2 of the Prevention

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614DEC000152309

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2016

14 juin 2016

applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the non ‑ enforcement of a final domestic court decision rendered in his favour

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0614DEC006622812

Admin. suprême

14 juin 2016

14 juin 2016

applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the non ‑ enforcement of a final domestic court decision rendered in his favour

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0415DEC000629809

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2014

15 avril 2014

  1 about the prolonged non-enforcement of the domestic decisions in its favour.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2637

Admin. suprême

7 juin 2007

7 juin 2007

had not presented any proof of the intention of the State Foreign Trade Agency “Soyuzplodoimport” to convert itself into another company or to reorganise itself so as to separate from its assets in favour

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1013DEC002742111

Admin. suprême

13 octobre 2015

13 octobre 2015

On 15 February 2009 the applicant chanted slogans in favour of the leader of an illegal organisation, Abdullah Öcalan. On 24 April 2009 he attended the Newroz celebration.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-5458

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2002

31 janvier 2002

He was in favour of a united democratic republic for Turkish and Greek Cypriots. On 6 July 1996, he was shot dead in front of his house in the “TRNC” by unidentified persons.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0114DEC005550212

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2014

14 janvier 2014

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0917DEC003807711

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2013

17 septembre 2013

The applicant complained under Article 6 of the Convention about the non-enforcement of a domestic judgment in his favour and under Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention about the violation of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0520DEC001015405

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2008

20 mai 2008

On 6 March 2003 the Bălţi Regional Court found in the applicant’s favour and ordered the local authorities of the Edineţ County to pay him 132,473 Moldovan lei (MDL).

Source officielle

Page 42 sur 606

← PrécédentSuivant →