Turkey , no. 25657/94, § 282, ECHR 2001-VII, and Talat Tepe v. Turkey , no. 31247/96, § 48, 21 December 2004).

Republic of Azerbaijan lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Azerbaijani national, Mrs Latifa Talat

Türkiye 21/10/2021 Hüseyin Talha GÜLSOY 1989 Isparta Turkish 188. 53277/21 Yalman v. Türkiye 22/10/2021 Havva YALMAN 1990 Gaziantep Turkish 189. 53391/21 Dönmez v.

Türkiye 02/02/2023 Talat CENGİZ 1982 Burdur Turkish 304. 8235/23 Bozdemir v. Türkiye 02/02/2023 İbrahim BOZDEMİR 1986 Uşak Turkish 305. 8236/23 Kaynak v.

To assess this evidence, the Court has generally applied the standard of proof “beyond reasonable doubt” (see Talat Tepe v. Turkey , no. 31247/96, § 48, 21 December 2004).

said to have by implication, through his conduct, waived an important right under Article 6, it must be shown that he could reasonably have foreseen what the consequences of his conduct would be (see Talat

To assess this evidence, it has generally applied the standard of proof “beyond reasonable doubt” (see, among many others, Talat Tepe v.   Turkey , no. 31247/96, § 48, 21 December 2004).

#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mill-High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court).

för kemikalier – Artiklarna 41 och 42 – Utvärdering av registreringsunderlag och kontroll av de uppgifter som lämnas in av registranterna – Deklaration om att krav inte uppfyllts – Rättsakt mot vilken talan

#Vorabentscheidungsersuchen des Tallinna Ringkonnakohus.

existence of the remedy required by Article 5 §   4 must be sufficiently certain, failing which it will lack the accessibility and effectiveness required for the purposes of that provision (see Talat

his own free will, either expressly or tacitly, entitlement to the guarantees of a fair trial as neither the letter nor the spirit of Article 6 of the Convention prevents a person from doing so (see Talat

To assess this evidence, the Court has generally applied the standard of proof “beyond reasonable doubt” (see   Talat Tepe v.   Turkey , no. 31247/96, § 48, 21 December 2004).

#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari mressqa mit-Tartu ringkonnakohus.

#OC i in. przeciwko Banca d'talia i in.#Wniosek o wydanie orzeczenia w trybie prejudycjalnym złożony przez Consiglio di Stato.#Odesłanie prejudycjalne – Dopuszczalność – Artykuły 63 i nast.

#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa mir-Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats 's-Hertogenbosch.

#Talba għal deċiżjoni preliminari, imressqa minn High Court (l-Irlanda).

[ZD] née le 28 octobre 1892 à [Localité 149] mariée en premières noces le 15 juin 1909 à [Localité 149] à Puraga Etaia a [IO], mariée en secondes noces le 19 avril 1939 à [Localité 149] à Mahinui a TAHAIA

Going beyond the domestic authorities’ findings of fact and applying a particularly thorough scrutiny (see, among other authorities, Talat   Tepe   v.   Turkey , no.

and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by ten Turkish nationals, Mr Ahmet Okyay, Ms Derya Durmaz, Mr Rıfat Bozkurt, Mr Noyan Özkan, Mr Uğur Kalelioğlu, Ms   Banu Karabulut, Mr Senih Özay, Mr Talat