In addition to restating consistently that the exceptions to return under the Hague Convention must be interpreted strictly (see X v.

It found that the prosecution had not sought to manipulate the custody time-limit by the addition or substitution of a manslaughter charge.

Une ordonnance de non-conciliation a été rendue le 14 mars 2005 entre les époux, fixant les mesures suivantes : - Attribution de la jouissance du domicile conjugal à Mme X... née Y..., à titre gratuit

The court considered that the preventive measure was to facilitate extradition.

    Article 18 governs the surrender of the person to be extradited and provides that: “1.

Major G. had done everything within his power to save their lives: he had instructed them to stop and surrender and had fired warning shots.

    The applicants applied for a judicial review of the blocking measure.

In addition, he was expelled from Denmark with a ban on returning. 12.

was of the view that the measures sought amounted to an “inadmissible interference with the activities of a company”.

On 8   December   2011 the Court indicated an interim measure under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court and held that the applicant should not be removed to Nigeria until further notice.

At the date of the latest communication from the parties (October 2020) those measures were still in force.

It noted that the estate had been taken under a   confiscation measure that applied to Jews.

    The Court observes that the judicial authorities, in addition to the reasonable suspicion against the applicant, relied principally on two grounds, namely (1) the severity of the penalty

He also requested that the applicant be ordered, under Article 199 § 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to surrender his ID card and international passport.

  The applicant has not alleged that the measure was in any way unlawful.

Article 170a “A coercive measure may be used only when there is sufficient reason to do so.

Major G. had done everything within his power to save their lives: he had instructed them to stop and surrender and had fired warning shots.

  With a view to the complete cessation of its activity, the applicant company brought administrative proceedings to surrender the concessions which it held, and as part of the surrender process numerous

The third applicant was amongst the hostages herself and, in addition, lost her husband, Mr V.   Medvedev. 10.

On 26   November 2004 the Real Estate Office in Budva registered the interim measure in the Real Estate Registry, and the premises were sealed on 7 December 2004. 6.