a national authority for that claim.

The applicant also increased the amount of his claim for damages and requested leave to call one witness.

    On 15 March 2019 the TAR upheld the applicants’ claims.

D. for defamation and a compensation claim under the Media Act against the owner and publisher of “Der 13.”

PROCÉDURE : Par contrat du 15 octobre 2008 l'association AEAH de la Combraille, aux droits de laquelle vient aujourd'hui l'Association Départementale de Parents de Personnes Handicapées Mentales et

The Government contested these claims. 50.

    On 2 June 2004 the Municipal Court dismissed the second applicant's claim as well as his application for an interim measure.

It dismissed the remainder of the applicants’ claim as regards non-pecuniary damage and rejected their claim for costs and expenses. 4.

Fifth, the interest rates offered by the applicant’s company, which varied from 6% to 8% per month, were staggering compared with the interest rates offered by [commercial] banks.

Given that the applicants had not produced evidence to substantiate their exact share, their claim was contested by the Government. 34.

    As regards Mr Martin Kočko, the applicants claim that he had sustained a scraped elbow and a crushed arm, which required a recovery time of seven to ten days.

. / Pour les déchets dangereux, l'emballage portera systématiquement des indications claires permettant de connaître la nature du contenu ".

Derollepot, premier conseiller, les conclusions de Mme Coutarel, rapporteure publique, les observations de M. D..., et de Me Duraz, avocate de la commune de Yenne.

    As regards the claims for pecuniary damage, the Government argued that the second applicant's claim for the costs of the publication of the judgment was not sufficiently substantiated, as

Their claims should also be looked at from a more general perspective.

On 4 July 2003 the applicant specified her outstanding claim at the court’s request. 59.

Her claims were granted by the courts as there had been no legal grounds for the suspension.

    On 12 May 1994 the Briceni District Court allowed the applicant company's claims.

  Non-pecuniary damage: claim allowed in part (De Santa, Abenavoli and Nicodemo). 3.   Pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage: claim allowed in part (Lapalorcia). B.