AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1010638-1047517
27 mai 2004
27 mai 2004
Consequently, it held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 3.
Source officielleciv1
61372222cd580146773fa80d
25 octobre 1994
25 octobre 1994
AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIERE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par : 1 / la société anonyme Heli Union, dont le siège social est à Paris
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2136029-2267420
16 janvier 2008
16 janvier 2008
*** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date [2] .
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1812973-1901905
13 octobre 2006
13 octobre 2006
In its Chamber judgment of 5 July 2005, the European Court of Human Rights held, by six votes to one, that there had been no violation of Article 8.
Source officiellePRESS;ADMISSIBILITYDECISIONS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1309950-1366405
6 avril 2005
6 avril 2005
The United Nation’s plan for the reunification of Cyprus (the Foundation Agreement – Settlement Plan) was put to the vote in Cyprus on 24 April 2004, with two separate referendums being held for
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1022042-1056798
8 juin 2004
8 juin 2004
On 4 February 2000 the High Court held that since the Grahams enjoyed factual possession of the land from January 1984, and adverse possession took effect from September 1984, the applicant companies
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1968065-2069545
5 avril 2007
5 avril 2007
During the consultation held that day with medical staff, Ms Evans and J were informed that they would each need to sign a form consenting to the treatment and that, in accordance with the provisions of
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-115508
28 novembre 2012
28 novembre 2012
On 2 May 2009 the Bergen City Court ordered the applicant to be held in pre-trial detention for four weeks on the ground of reasonable suspicion of his having committed an offence that was
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2264727-2415407
6 février 2008
6 février 2008
In a judgment of 22 March 2007, the Court held, by four votes to three, that there had been a violation of Article 8 of the Convention.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2965484-3264864
10 décembre 2009
10 décembre 2009
The administrative court dismissed both her complaints: the one on the merits and the one requesting an oral hearing; as regards the latter it held that an oral hearing was not likely to help clarify
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1257000-1309335
2 février 2005
2 février 2005
*** After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-640793-646339
24 octobre 2002
24 octobre 2002
It further held that the finding of a violation constituted in itself sufficient just satisfaction. (The judgment is in French only.)
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68151-68619
19 janvier 2000
19 janvier 2000
After the hearing the Court will begin its deliberations, which are held in private. Judgment will be delivered at a later date.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-214397
24 novembre 2021
24 novembre 2021
On 14 and 15 June 2016 he was interrogated by the police with the help of interpreter B.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68130-68598
19 septembre 2000
19 septembre 2000
During the arrest Mr Köksal’s head came into contact with the ground, he was handcuffed, dragged along the floor and held down.
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1951993-2051190
14 mars 2007
14 mars 2007
It held that the refusal to grant the applicant authorisation had not been based on her choice of lifestyle and had not therefore given rise to a breach of Articles 8 (right to respect for private and
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68124-68592
29 mai 2000
29 mai 2000
The leadership dispute continued until a unification conference was held in October 1997.
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68281-68749
25 février 2000
25 février 2000
The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 and awarded him ITL 30,000,000 for non-pecuniary damage and ITL 5,000,000 for costs and expenses.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-867056-889797
30 octobre 2003
30 octobre 2003
The Court accordingly held, unanimously, that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1.
Source officiellePRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1504663-1578209
15 novembre 2005
15 novembre 2005
The court dismissed the applicant’s appeals in two further hearings, only one of which was held in the presence of the parties.
Source officiellePage 43 sur 2440
HELLIERE, Patrick, Gérard, Pascal
17/04/2026
Voir →
SARL HELLIER
18/12/2025
Voir →
SCCV DU HELLIER, STE EN LIQUIDATION
10/08/2025
Voir →
SELARL DU DOCTEUR HELLIER
15/07/2025
Voir →
Roul De La Helliere, Gaétan, Aymeric, Raymond
20/04/2025
Voir →