CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

65 529 résultats pour « Hiss »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-191327

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2019

22 janvier 2019

concerning the charges against him.

Source officielle

Page 43 sur 3277

← PrécédentSuivant →
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1012DEC000792304

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2006

12 octobre 2006

The applicant alleges that the victim identified him because the investigator in charge of his case had shown him the record of the applicant’s questioning which contained a detailed description of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1969:0522DEC000285766

Admin. suprême

22 mai 1969

22 mai 1969

He was found guilty of having thrown nitric acid in the face of his mistress, who had left him against his will, causing her to lose the sight of one eye.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173268

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2017

29 mars 2017

She also reiterated that the child was not used to spending time without his mother and that forcing him to travel to Italy on weekends to see his father was unpractical at his age. 7 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110029

Admin. suprême

24 janvier 2012

24 janvier 2012

Furthermore, the refusal of a building permit for part of his land pending the construction of the public utility networks from his own funds amounted to a disproportionate burden on him, in so far as

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0204JUD008155312

Admin. suprême

4 février 2016

4 février 2016

Mammadov submitted in his statement that on 21 June 2012 police officers arrested him and dragged him into a car where they hit him on various parts of his body. On 22 June H.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-127371

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2013

23 septembre 2013

When I asked him which subject I had taught him, the reply was that it had been ‘electrical materials’ and that I had given him an average grade ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0602DEC000163803

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2005

2 juin 2005

According to his own submissions his mother accompanied him in order to assist him with the necessary practical arrangements upon his arrival. COMPLAINTS 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0823DEC002955511

Admin. suprême

23 août 2016

23 août 2016

He argued that the criminal charges against him had been dismissed, which warranted a re-examination of his disciplinary conviction. 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0514DEC002789205

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2013

14 mai 2013

They had allegedly handcuffed him to a table leg and beat him with rubber truncheons, punching him and kicking him in various parts of his body.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-184698

Admin. suprême

20 juin 2018

20 juin 2018

He was taken to the toilet several times at his request. Following one such request, a police officer took him out and shackled him to a motorcycle on a lorry outside.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-148352

Admin. suprême

4 novembre 2014

4 novembre 2014

He further complained that there was no reasonable suspicion that he had committed a criminal offence because the narcotic substances found on his person and in his flat did not belong to him and that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-120350

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2013

6 mai 2013

He came to work in the morning, but then hid in his illegal firms in Makiyivka or in the computer centre in Khartsyzk, while continuing to receive his salary and bonuses.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0702DEC003296296

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 1997

2 juillet 1997

and also placed him under judicial guardianship during his detention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110364

Admin. suprême

14 février 2012

14 février 2012

According to the applicant, before 10 May 2011 his medical monitoring had been limited to measuring his blood pressure and weighing him, along with a superficial examination by the SIZO doctor.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1102JUD008131517

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2021

2 novembre 2021

As a result, the guards went in and hit him, causing him to bruise; however, they were not able to take his Bible away. 24 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181772

Admin. suprême

22 février 2018

22 février 2018

Shortly afterwards, as he was moved from the premises of the prosecutor’s office, the police officers hit his head against a car which was parked nearby.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-240215

Admin. suprême

10 décembre 2024

10 décembre 2024

He also claims that the failure to implement the final judicial decision in his favour (see below) breached his right of access to a court, as well as that he had no effective remedies at his disposal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114DEC006511711

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2020

14 janvier 2020

matters relevant to his detention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1964:0306DEC000203863

Admin. suprême

6 mars 1964

6 mars 1964

Adenauer, to support his pension claim against Y.   He reminded Dr. Adenauer that, in 1929, he had given his shares in Y of substantial value and he threatened to sue him.

Source officielle