The applicants did not file any submissions in this connection. 21.

At the time he had tried to film the procedure, his battery had been low and he had stopped the filming process soon after starting it.

    accurate and, where necessary, kept up to date; ...” Article 6.

  The demonstrators kept returning to the protest site in front of the Parliament building.

Özel, Mehmet et Şadiye Yüce, les parents de M me Yüce (Ergüden), Hasan Kılıç, le fils de M. et M me   Kılıç, Kazim Erdoğan, le fils de M. et M me Erdoğan, ainsi que Can Çakır, le fils de M.

Contrary to many other cases examined by the Court where there was no evidence in the case file that the relevant correspondence was sent to the applicants (see, for example, Strizhak v.

He claimed that he had left drops of blood on the case-file materials as evidence of the assault. His co-defendant Mr   M. also complained of ill-treatment.

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 15   January 2012 as a Committee composed of:   Dragoljub Popović, President,   Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque,   Helen Keller

Il ajouta qu’il se conformerait à son obligation d’entretien de son fils mineur dès que sa situation financière le permettrait. 15.

kept on them by the organs of the Securitate ...

In this connection, the material in the case file suggests that the pre-trial investigation was promptly resumed by the prosecutor and completed within one month.

Accordingly, he had to file a criminal complaint with the competent public prosecutor for alleged bribing.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Article 5 § 3 of the Convention that he was kept in detention in police custody for thirteen days without being brought before a judge or other officer authorised

Par des mémoires en défense, enregistrés les 22 septembre 2022 et 24 juin 2024, la société par actions simplifiée Bouygues Bâtiment Nord-Est, représentée par Me Kessler, conclut : 1°) au rejet de la

    Le 8 avril 2013, le premier requérant déclara reconnaître A. comme son fils devant un notaire à Bruxelles. 14.

May 1972, forwarded to the District Court of Krems the guardianship files together with a request to allow the applicant to inspect the files and "to ask him, on rogatory commission, whether he agreed

The investigating judge decided to place her in detention on remand on account of the evidence in the file and the nature of the offences against her.

The investigating judge decided to place her in detention on remand on account of the evidence in the file and the nature of the offences against her.

According to the applicant, the registers in question were never transmitted and examined in court, since they had disappeared from the criminal case file in unknown circumstances.