The provisions of domestic law establishing legal avenues for complaints about quality of medical services are cited in the following judgments: Koryak v.

Russia , nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, §§   102-104, 10 January 2012; Koryak v. Russia , no. 24677/10, § 80-81, 13   November 2012; Dirdizov v.

  The applicant is a Turkish citizen, born in 1965 and resident at Meram, Konya, Turkey. He was represented before the Commission by Ms Gerda E.M. Later, a lawyer practising in The Hague.

It appears that the applicant was subsequently permitted to reside in Konya. 12.

xa0; The reasons prohibiting the Minister from making a deportation order under section 5 of the 1996 Act are virtually identical to the qualification for refugee status under section 2 of that Act ( Kouaype

remedies existed in Russia for applicants who have complained of an ongoing deterioration in their health as a result of a lack of proper medical care while in detention (see, among other authorities, Koryak

  73359/10, §   29, 8 April 2014; Koryak v. Russia , no. 24677/10, §§ 58-68, 13   November 2012; Getiren v. Turkey , no. 10301/03, §§ 61-62, 22 July 2008; and Toteva v.

  41461/10, §§   75-91, 92-100 and 108-111, 27 November 2012 and Koryak v. Russia , no. 24677/10, §§ 74-96 and 102-110, 13 November 2012). THE FACTS I.

    The provisions of domestic law establishing the legal avenues for complaints about the quality of medical services are cited in the following judgments: Koryak v.

inmates, the Court may find itself obliged to perform a first-hand evaluation of evidence before it to determine whether the guarantees of Articles 2 or 3 of the Convention have been respected (see Koryak

  40016/98, §§   25-26, ECHR 2003-IX; Koryak v. Russia , no. 24677/10, §   68, 13 November 2012; and Romankevič v. Lithuania , no. 25747/07, §   16, 2   December 2014). II.

  Russia (no. 41461/10, §§ 47-61, 27 November 2012); and Koryak v.   Russia , (no. 24677/10, §§ 46-57, 13 November 2012). THE LAW I.

    The Court has examined a large number of cases against Russia raising complaints of inadequate medical services afforded to inmates (see, among the most recent examples, Koryak v.

medical treatment, the Court reiterates that it has consistently held that a civil claim for damages, as proposed by the Government as “an effective remedy”, did not satisfy the relevant criteria (see Koryak

reiterates that it has previously examined and dismissed similar arguments on the part of the Government in relation to a continuous situation of absent or inadequate medical care in detention (see Koryak

      3706/09 Nazli Gürtekin 28/10/1926 Lefkoşa / Mersin 10 Ali Gürtekin 05/01/1963 Lefkoşa / Mersin 10 Mehmet Salih Gürtekin 19/02/1954 Lefkoşa / Mersin 10 Lema Tavli 25/12/1955 Konya

He had been appointed as leader with responsibility for judges in 2015 and 2016 for Konya Province and had been responsible for eleven judges and prosecutors in the so-called T4 and T5 groups.

Nationality Represented by      60441/13 19/09/2013 Nazli GÜRTEKİN 28/10/1926 Lefkoşa / Mersin 10   Mehmet Salih GÜRTEKİN 19/02/1954 Lefkoşa / Mersin 10   Lema TAVLI 25/12/1955 Konya

Similar remarks to the ones quoted above were made in respect of the Roma population living in other parts of Turkey such as İzmir, Manisa, Konya, Adana and Antalya. 13.

  49288/11 16/05/2011 İsmail UYAR 11/07/1972 Konya   Ahmet BİLGİN The applicant, a sergeant, was dismissed from his post as he had been declared unfit for service by a medical report dated 31