O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 17 June 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

The Court notes that the domestic proceedings in the present case concerned a civil law dispute between private individuals and, therefore, they do not themselves engage the responsibility of the State

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 2 September 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 8 July 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 24 August 2004, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

,   Ljiljana Mijović,   David Thór Björgvinsson,   Ján Šikuta,   Päivi Hirvelä,   Mihai Poalelungi, judges, and Lawrence Early, Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private

#xa0; Ján Šikuta,   Dragoljub Popović,   Luis López Guerra,   Kristina Pardalos,   Iulia Antoanella Motoc, judges, and Santiago Quesada, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 6 May 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 24   June   2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 13 May 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 10 June 2003 Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 6 May 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

    On 30 January 2001 the applicant converted part of her savings (DEM 20,000) into privatisation coupons under the Privatisation of Companies Act 1998.

She argued that those judgments were legally wrong and violated her right to respect for her private life and home.

For these reasons, the Court unanimously Decides to adjourn the examination of the applicants’ complaints concerning the interference with their right to respect for their private and family life and with

    The first applicant is a private company, incorporated under Cypriot law and registered in Nicosia in 1986 (“the company”).

Application no. 64684/01 by Gülseren ÖNER and Others against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 1 st   June 2004 as a Chamber composed of   Sir   Nicolas

    Judgment in each case was given by a Chamber of seven judges, composed as follows:   Jean-Paul Costa   (French), President, Nicolas Bratza   (British), Loukis Loucaides  

In May 2002, she brought a civil action claiming back money she had lent to a private person in September 1998.