Two further hearings were held in the same year and one in 2012.

She referred to the earlier decisions by the Court of Appeal and stated that the claims of three former colleagues who had been dismissed on the same grounds as her had been upheld and they had been reinstated

The police, alerted to the disappearance the same day, interviewed witnesses from the nursing home who testified that they had immediately searched the area of the nursing home in vain.

  Complaints, procedure and composition of the Court   Relying on Article   6   §   1 Mr Rausch complained about the excessive length of the proceedings, which had already lasted

On the same day the judge at the Bakırköy Magistrates Court ordered his pre-trial detention. The applicant stated that he had been tortured in police custody without giving any details.

Due to pending criminal proceedings concerning the same accident, the first hearing, scheduled for 3 June 2004, was postponed indefinitely on the request of the applicant.

His wife joined him in the same year but her presence was not legalised until she was awarded a contract of employment in 2008.

In particular, he submitted that the Department was unlawfully refusing to comply with the final court judgment of 16 July 2010 and that the procedure had lasted an excessively lengthy period of time.

The same conclusion applied to the limb of the complaint alleging a failure to provide information on the risks associated with transfusions. Conclusion : no violation (unanimously).

The search started at 6 a.m. and lasted about four hours.

unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 (right to a fair hearing) of the European Convention on Human Rights, on account of the judicial proceedings in the applicant’s case having lasted

On the same day the applicant lodged a supervisory appeal under the Act on the Protection of the Right to a Trial without undue Delay.

In a letter of the same day the applicant was informed that he had to show what complaints he had raised and what documents he needed in order to support them.

The proceedings thus lasted almost three years and seven months for two levels of jurisdiction.

Moreover, the criminal proceedings had lasted a particularly long time, which was reason to impose a lesser punishment than the maximum sentence of life imprisonment.

On the same date it also ordered that the report at issue be obtained from the Institute of Forensic Experts (Instytut Ekspertyz Sądowych) in Kraków.

The first period lasted less than one year until the Court of Appeal’s decision on 26   July 2018.

Complaints based on the same facts were also communicated under other provisions of the Convention.

  The court adjourned the case pending the outcome of parallel proceedings against the same defendant.

  Throughout the proceedings the same member of the regional audit court acted as rapporteur.