CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:CO10027
17 janvier 2024
Sur le rapport de Mme Guillou, conseiller, les observations écrites de la SARL Cabinet Rousseau et Tapie, avocat de la société Etablissements Dargaud, de la SCP Rocheteau, Uzan-Sarano et Goulet, avocat
Page 44 sur 1314
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:CO10396
11 septembre 2024
Sur le rapport de Mme Guillou, conseiller, les observations écrites de la SARL Meier-Bourdeau, Lécuyer et associés, avocat de M.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:CO10302
12 juin 2024
Sur le rapport de Mme Guillou, conseiller, les observations écrites de la SARL Cabinet Munier-Apaire, avocat de la société Gelied, après débats en l'audience publique du 30 avril 2024 où étaient présents
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2024:CO10299
Sur le rapport de Mme Guillou, conseiller, les observations écrites de la SCP Le Bret-Desaché, avocat de la société Gelied, après débats en l'audience publique du 30 avril 2024 où étaient présents M.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2023:CO10660
25 octobre 2023
Sur le rapport de Mme Guillou, conseiller, les observations écrites de la SCP Zribi et Texier, avocat de M.
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2023:CO10707
22 novembre 2023
Sur le rapport de Mme Guillou, conseiller, les observations écrites de Me Bouthors, avocat de M.
civ3
613723d1cd5801467740e8af
7 mai 2002
Jean-Pierre Z..., demeurant chez Mme Micheline X..., "Les Crochets", 45600 Guilly, en cassation d'un jugement rendu le 16 novembre 1999 par le tribunal d'instance de Gien, au profit de Mme Bernadette
Tribunal Administratif de La Réunion
DTA_2200959_20220915
15 septembre 2022
O R D O N N E : Article 1er : La requête de la SCI Play, de la SCI Guieva et de Mme D épouse B est rejetée.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11756
23 novembre 2017
The fact that the lay judges made up a majority had had no impact either as the applicant was convicted by nine votes to six, where five out of the nine judges giving a guilty verdict were professional
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1027JUD002137704
27 octobre 2009
On 12 May 1993 the Kırklareli Military Court acquitted the applicant in relation to certain charges and found him guilty of the remaining offences. 7.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1003DEC004898716
3 octobre 2024
On 16 June 2022 the Senate of the Supreme Court remitted the case to the Riga Regional Court for a fresh examination of his guilty verdict.
ECLI:CEDH:002-14484
1 juillet 2025
The Court could not base its assessment of risk on the likely sentence an applicant would receive if they pled guilty.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0518DEC002116708
18 mai 2010
COMPLAINT The applicant complained under Article 6 § 2 of the Convention about a violation of his right to be presumed innocent until proved guilty.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0205JUD003551921
5 février 2026
Following the quashing of the first-instance court’s judgment, which had dismissed the charges for ne bis in idem , in the resumed proceedings, the Rijeka Municipal Court found the applicant guilty of
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0414DEC007305813
14 avril 2015
The following shall be guilty of money laundering and punished with a term of imprisonment not exceeding four years or a fifth-category fine: a.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0906DEC001539689
6 septembre 1991
The result of the test was consistent with the applicant being the biological father of V, and he eventually pleaded guilty to the allegation of incest.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0505DEC002085892
5 mai 1993
In respect of the first charge his defence was that he was not guilty of murder but was guilty of manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility, based on the evidence of three psychiatrists
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CEDH:001-127427
26 septembre 2013
It also found the applicant guilty of a new offence which carried a less severe punishment, sentenced him to a one-year suspended sentence and confirmed the lower courts’ judgments in part in allowing
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:1113DEC004621399
13 novembre 2003
K.T. was found guilty of being a member of an illegal organisation and sentenced to three years' imprisonment and a fine of TRL 1,250,000,000. He was banned from the civil service for three years.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-204305
6 juillet 2020
Meanwhile, on 1 August 2014 the Zayeltsevskiy District Court of Novosibirsk found the applicant guilty of an offence under Article 20.2 § 1 of the Code of Administrative Offences and sentenced him to a