The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 10   March 2015 as a Chamber composed of:   András Sajó, President,   Işıl Karakaş,   Nebojša Vučinić,   Helen Keller

The Court finds that it is not clear from the case-file whether the applicant raised this issue before the Court of Cassation.

À l’arrêt de chambre était joint l’exposé des opinions dissidentes des juges Sajó, Keller et Kjølbro. 5.

In the case of Kesler and Others v.

unredacted documents to be added to the file instead.

It appears that these promissory notes remain in the case file kept by the registry of the Gagarinskiy District Court of Moscow. The judgment of 15 January 2001 remains without enforcement.

; 2)     to become familiar with documents based on which a person was subjected to a sentence or another compulsory measure; ... 5)     to release immediately persons kept unlawfully

on the applicant and the file pertaining to his medical examinations.

  The request to consult the case-file   On 15 September 1997 the applicant’s lawyer requested to consult the investigator’s case-file.

    The applicant raised the issue of the existence of a separate confidential file kept by the prosecution, and complained that as he had not had access to that file, he had been prevented from

The letter further informed the prosecutor that no copies of the criminal investigation file or of the personal file on the first applicant had been preserved, with the exception of the entry cards.

On 10 February 2010 the applicant lodged an initiative to the Public Prosecutor to file a request for the protection of legality ( inicijativa za podizanje zahteva za zaštitu zakonitosti ) against the

Under the same head, the applicant also submitted that the review proceedings had been conducted solely on the basis of the case file.

They are given an adequate time-limit to submit the case-file and to file their replies. 2.

The applicant appealed against the judgment and argued that the first ‑ instance court had misinterpreted the evidence available in the file.

kept in the relevant archives.

It therefore decides to proceed with the examination of the application as the case file stands. B.     Admissibility 1.

The case file was assigned the number 12275.

When finding the applicant guilty the trial court took into account his confession and examined it against the evidence from the case file. 46.