are discharging their heavy responsibilities in a manner that is in conformity with the aim which is the basis of the task entrusted to them (see Marian Maciejewski , cited above, loc. cit., Mustafa Erdoğan

Finland , 16 December 1997, § 55, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-VIII; and Erdoğan Yağız v. Turkey , no.   27473/02 , § 37, 6 March 2007). 49 .

Turkey 25/03/2019 Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 37 20267/19 Erdoğan v.

Erdoğan and Ms E.E. Keskin, and the Delegate of the Commission on the organisation of the written procedure.

  29697/96, 14 March 2000; and Sevgi Erdoğan v.

, the Court considers that the involvement of one of the applicants was sufficient and that it was not necessary for all seven applicants to intervene in the investigation (see, inter alia , Yüksel Erdoğan

  15601/02, § 47, 18 March 2008; Ayhan Erdoğan v.   Turkey , no. 39656/03, § 25, 13   January 2009; and Milisavljević , cited above, § 34).

  15601/02, § 47, 18 March 2008; Ayhan Erdoğan v.   Turkey , no. 39656/03, § 25, 13   January 2009; and Milisavljević , cited above, § 34). 60.

Application no. 21184/02 by Erdoğan İren Until October 1994 the applicant lived in Eğrikavak, a village of the Ovacık district in Tunceli, where he owns property.

However, subsequent to the admissibility decision of the Court, the first applicant Mrs Cennet Ayhan dismissed the aforementioned lawyers and appointed Mr Ali Uluk and Mr Hasan Erdoğan as her representatives

    As regards the application lodged by Adil Erdoğan, the Bitlis Compensation Commission decided to award YTL 466.88 (approximately EUR 300) for the death of the claimant’s cow during a clash

    An application concerning the events prior to Mr Süleyman Yeter’s death was examined by the Court in the case of Erdoğan Yılmaz and Others v. Turkey (no.

agent of the State is accused of crimes which violate Article 3, the criminal proceedings and sentencing must not be time-barred and the granting of an amnesty or pardon should not be permissible (see Erdoğan

  34738/04, §§   38-42, 5   June 2007; Erdoğan Yılmaz and Others v. Turkey , no. 19374/03, §   57, 14   October 2008; Erdal Aslan v.

At the same time, the leaders of the criminal political economic clique demonstrated their closeness to the dictatorial and anti-people regime of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, now President, and, until recently

(xvii)   Statement of Mehmet Beşir Erdoğan, a villager, dated 4 June 1994, taken by the Yığılca District Gendarmerie.

the limits of critical comment are wider as they   are inevitably and knowingly exposed to public scrutiny and must therefore display a particularly high degree of tolerance (see Ayhan   Erdoğan

  There appeared before the Court:   (a)     for the Government   Mr Erdoğan İşcan ,         Agent, Mr Hacı Ali Açikgül , Mr Stefan Talmon ,     &

Turkey 16/03/2021 Lack of relevant and sufficient reasons for detention Lack of reasonable suspicion 218 16421/21 Erdoğan v.