The applicants complained about the unreasonable delay in enforcement of the final judgments given in their favour. 4.

II] Article 5 Article 5-1-c Reasonable suspicion Prolonged detention of journalists/publishers owing to unreasonable equation of their editorial stance, covered by press freedom, with propaganda in favour

    The applicant complained of the non-enforcement of the domestic decision given in her favour.

    On 25   December 2005 the Parish asked for the supervisory review of the judgments in the applicant’s favour. 16.

COMPLAINT Relying on Articles 1, 6 and 17 of the Convention, the applicant complained about the State’s failure to enforce the court decision in her favour.

    The judgment given in the applicant's favour by the Odessa Regional Arbitration Court on 24 June 1998 remains unenforced. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 11.

The Court is satisfied that the Government explicitly acknowledge the excessive length of the execution of judgments in the applicants’ favour.

The final judgments in the applicants’ favour remain unenforced until the present day. B.   Relevant domestic law and practice 1.

    Judgments given in favour of the first applicant 5.

    The applicant complained about the length of the non-enforcement of the judgment in his favour.

    The applicant complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the judgment given in his favour. He invoked Article   13 of the Convention.

    The applicant complained that the State authorities had failed to enforce the judgment taken in her favour in timely fashion.

    On 15 February 2002 the applicant sent a complaint to the Minister of Finance concerning non-execution of the judgment in her favour. 12.

This sale had happened before 20   July 2005, when the judgment in their favour was quashed and before the present application was lodged.

    The Court observes that that on 25 June 2002 the applicant obtained a judgment in his favour.

    The applicant complained that the non-enforcement of the judgment in his favour had violated his rights under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No.

    The applicant complained about the length of the non-enforcement of the judgment in his favour.

    The judgments given in the applicants’ favour remain unenforced. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 10.

The applicant first complained about the non-enforcement of the judgment in his favour.