CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

3 457 résultats pour « Flavie Botti »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1009JUD000550706

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2008

9 octobre 2008

    The applicant’s father owned a flat in Moscow. In June 1993, a certain K., acting on behalf of the applicant’s father, sold the flat to L. In October 1993 the applicant’s father died.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0217JUD002576094

Admin. suprême

17 février 2004

17 février 2004

    The applicant saw flames rising from the village and his hamlet, and the women and children began to weep.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-521446-522886

Admin. suprême

21 mars 2002

21 mars 2002

The applicants were both arrested and committed to prison on 20   February 1988 in connection with other proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9320

Admin. suprême

7 janvier 2014

7 janvier 2014

The case of Losonci Rose and Rose concerned the requirement, under Swiss law, to submit a joint request to the authorities where both spouses wished to take the woman’s surname, failing which the husband

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14132

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2023

27 juin 2023

It found that both the inclusion of the applicant on the list of wanted persons and the disclosure of that information, by posting her photograph on the wanted board, had interfered with her right to respect

Source officielle
CA

Cour d'Appel

6253c8e0bd3db21cbdd8680a

Appel

9 octobre 2003

9 octobre 2003

LITIGE Monsieur Julien X... a été victime du vol de son véhicule automobile AUDI 100 TDI le 3 octobre 1999 à DOMPIERRE-SUR-VEYLE (Ain) dans les circonstances suivantes : voulant déposer un mot dans la boîte

Source officielle
TA

5e chambre

DTA_2406082_20240829

Administratif

29 août 2024

29 août 2024

Par le même arrêté, le ministre lui a également interdit de paraître le 26 juin 2024 sur l'itinéraire de la flamme olympique à Mulhouse, à Huningue et à Colmar, et entre le 14 juillet 2024 et le 11 août

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0526JUD000393202

Admin. suprême

26 mai 2009

26 mai 2009

In order to obtain a larger flat from the Institute, it was agreed that the applicant would transfer title to her own flat to the Institute.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021REP002734795

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 1998

21 octobre 1998

Dickson and, subsequently, Mr Eaton, both of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.   4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0108JUD002525104

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2013

8 janvier 2013

    Later the same day a group of armed police broke into the applicant’s flat with the intention of searching it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410JUD007718011

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2018

10 avril 2018

They found that it would be beneficial for A. to maintain contact with both parents. He was equally attached to both of them. Both parents were equally capable of raising the child.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1003JUD000350102

Admin. suprême

3 octobre 2006

3 octobre 2006

They stated that they had lived in the applicants’ flat from 1945 to 1992 as Bug River claimants.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1824544-1925265

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2006

2 novembre 2006

  As the former owners of three blocks of flats in Bucharest which had been nationalised, they brought legal proceedings to recover possession of the property.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1014JUD001818014

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2025

14 octobre 2025

on the basis of presidential orders; (b) about the sources of the housing fund from which those flats had been provided; (c) whether the State owned any other housing funds and whether the head of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-229903

Admin. suprême

30 novembre 2023

30 novembre 2023

trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - in particular, the right to examine police officers whose pre-trial statements or reports were used for convicting the applicant in both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0610DEC003822603

Admin. suprême

10 juin 2008

10 juin 2008

On 20 September 2002 the Warsaw District Court ordered that the above-mentioned right in the flat be sold at auction.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3081460-3413478

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2010

29 mars 2010

grounds for French law to be applied, as Cambodia was not a party to the conventions transposed into domestic law, in particular the Vienna Convention, and the Winner had not been flying the French flag

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0114DEC000051502

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2003

14 janvier 2003

The applicant said he had been in the flat on the evening of the killing, but at a time when Clarke was not there.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0225JUD006886814

Admin. suprême

25 février 2020

25 février 2020

At the material time, she was living with her three children and her mother, Ms P., in a two-room flat.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0613JUD005720221

Admin. suprême

13 juin 2023

13 juin 2023

While the SCA acknowledged that A. showed unreserved affection for the applicant and was close to both his parents, it found that separating mother and child was unacceptable and the existence of such

Source officielle

Page 45 sur 173

← PrécédentSuivant →