He did not appeal against his sentence or conviction.

Pursuant to the repealed paragraph 8 of Article 10 of the Directive, the applicant also permanently lost his eligibility to play for the Turkish national basketball team, as his status as a “Turkish basketball

The applicant challenged the findings of the expert, asking for his evidence to be excluded from the case.

Electric shocks were applied to his back and buttocks, and he was tied up and beaten on his bare heels with a baseball bat. The officers also beat him on his body with a belt.

    The applicant’s appeal against the detention order, likewise his further appeals against decisions prolonging his detention and all his subsequent, numerous applications for release and appeals

He noticed that he had been injured on his right arm and had the mark of five fingers on his face.

all his defence rights (judgments nos.

    On 13 April 1992 the applicant’s brother, Vladimir Mitranić, was killed in his house in Livno together with his friend K.P. 4.

("K."), a financial manager formerly employed by A., in his favour.

The Court considers that his daughter has a legitimate interest in pursuing the proceedings on his behalf.   2.

income due to his detention in Malta.

In addition, the university offered the applicant various solutions taking into account his particular circumstances throughout his time there, thus enabling him to continue his studies after his accident

his flat. 17.

his employer confirming his income and health insurance covering himself and his daughter, and stating that his post was based in Washington, DC, and did not require frequent travel; an opinion by the

The reason given for his recall was not the alleged offences (which were a matter for the court), but rather his failure to provide accurate information about his circumstances to his supervising probation

[The third applicant] interprets them as being the result of his being bullied at [his] school owing to [his] poverty and poor material resources.

His detention was also regularly reviewed on a monthly basis.

The applicant therefore maintained that his expulsion had been ordered to secure his rendition to the Uzbekistani authorities and thus to prevent him from being released and to secure either his expulsion

with his daughter.

submissions did not disclose that there would be “more than normal emotional ties” between his and his mother and siblings, that his mother and siblings lived separately from his father, and that the