CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

892 résultats pour « Melmi »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1211DEC000208905

Admin. suprême

11 décembre 2012

11 décembre 2012

xa0;    69644/10 22/10/2010 Ahmet KOBYAOĞLU 10/01/1962 İstanbul   Bektaş Gökhan HALİLOĞLU        71991/10 01/10/2010 Nigar KIZILTAN 15/10/1934 İstanbul   Melis

Source officielle

Page 45 sur 45

← Précédent
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0317JUD000520710

Admin. suprême

17 mars 2016

17 mars 2016

Prifti née Memi, lawyers 9 July 2010 5. Frashëri and Others, no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0415JUD000556019

Admin. suprême

15 avril 2021

15 avril 2021

In testimony dated 7 March 2019, it was stated that the “ teip ” to which the applicant belonged was called “ melhi ” or “ mialki ” and that it was an opponent of the regime in Chechnya.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;FRA;FRE

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0319DEC001022109

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2015

19 mars 2015

Palerme   Roberta KOHLSCWITTER 15/06/1958 Rome Ferdinando Emilio ABBATE   26007/09 28/04/2009 Saverio Michele CURRA   Patrizia MICARELLI 16/11/1968 Rome   Camillo CARLUCCI 30/10/1958 Melfi

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1127DEC003841797

Admin. suprême

27 novembre 2001

27 novembre 2001

The base of the cartridges ( mermi dip çukurları ) had not oxidised. There were no rifles around, only empty cartridges. ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0527JUD003986019

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2025

27 mai 2025

Given the tied vote, the challenge was dismissed (see,   for context, Meli and Swinkels Family Brewers N.V. v.   Albania , nos.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1016JUD004974711

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2012

16 octobre 2012

Until the end of its term in late 2011, it was largely ignored, and sometimes openly defied, by Osh Mayor Melis Myrzakmatov, the standard-bearer of an ethnic Kyrgyz-first policy and the most successful

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0524JUD003608897

Admin. suprême

24 mai 2005

24 mai 2005

The base of the cartridges ( mermi dip çukurları ) had not oxidised. There were no rifles around, only empty cartridges. ...

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0712JUD003974102

Admin. suprême

12 juillet 2007

12 juillet 2007

finding amounted to an acknowledgment of a breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, it cannot be regarded as adequate redress for the alleged violation of Article 6 § 1 (see, mutatis mutandis , Sür meli

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0109JUD001859713

Admin. suprême

9 janvier 2018

9 janvier 2018

The one used most frequently is that of the French sociologist Albert Memmi: ‘Racism is a generalising definition and evaluation of differences, whether real or imaginary, to the advantage of the one defining

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0708JUD002887322

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2025

8 juillet 2025

Albania , no. 72361/11, § 43, 22 May 2018; Meli v. Albania , nos.   41373/21 and 48801/21, § 83, 16 July 2024; Gaba v. Albania , no.   33369/17, § 101, 17 December 2024).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0826JUD008405617

Admin. suprême

26 août 2025

26 août 2025

sat in an incomplete panel of six judges in the applicants’ case, thereby complicating its decision-making process, was the extensive delays in the election or appointment of its new members (see also Meli

Source officielle