CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

924 résultats pour « Pascal Ammoura »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0615DEC006753101

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2004

15 juin 2004

Apart from that, the applicant had the right to correspond without limitation, as well as receive parcels, postal packages and money transfers.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1220JUD005177208

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2018

20 décembre 2018

This included the cost of food parcels delivered by his family (EUR 777.20), the total sum transferred to his prison account by his family throughout his detention (EUR 414.50), and the remaining sum spent

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:1023REP001835791

Admin. suprême

23 octobre 1995

23 octobre 1995

  The point at issue is whether the State authorities' failure to comply within a reasonable time with the decisions of the Council of State amounts to a violation of Article 6 para. 1 (Art. 6-1)

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0628JUD003175302

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2007

28 juin 2007

Furthermore, the Government argued, the applicant's sister should also be in a position to offer them a certain amount of support. 45.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0405DEC002519802

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2005

5 avril 2005

sequester the correspondence of the above-mentioned persons. (2)     The following fall into the category of correspondence that may be sequestered: letters of all kinds, telegrams, radiograms, parcels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002345903

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2011

7 juillet 2011

However, the current trend in international fora is to consider it part and parcel of the freedom of conscience and religion.” 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0611JUD002933411

Admin. suprême

11 juin 2015

11 juin 2015

Specialised Court of Ukraine for civil and criminal cases ( Вищий спеціалізований суд України з розгляду цивільних і кримінальних справ ) upheld the applicant’s prison sentence slightly reducing the amount

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0410JUD000495322

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2025

10 avril 2025

additional restrictions imposed on the applicant consisted of: limited visits by family members and no visits by non-family members; a prohibition on using the telephone; limits on receiving money and parcels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1109DEC006754201

Admin. suprême

9 novembre 2006

9 novembre 2006

It does not appear that the small amount of 200 roubles was important for the victim and there is no information about his income or dependants.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0922JUD001361688

Admin. suprême

22 septembre 1994

22 septembre 1994

Further building was not permitted on the land, which was entered in the land register in several different parcels: 2,126 sq. m of land, 406 sq. m of ground, house and appurtenant buildings, 130 sq. m

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1214DEC001203386

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 1987

14 décembre 1987

  The particular circumstances of the case           The applicants own a parcel of land called Ström 1:3 situated in the municipality of Botkyrka.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0426JUD001692290

Admin. suprême

26 avril 1995

26 avril 1995

The fear of adverse effects on the groundwater is thus not shown to be baseless - as the appellant’s objection amounts to saying - by even a single finding.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0122JUD004672099

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2004

22 janvier 2004

The land became part of a pool of state-owned land ( Bodenfond ) from which parcels of land of an average of eight hectares were redistributed to farmers who had little or no land of their own. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0615JUD003433404

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2010

15 juin 2010

    On 3 December 2003 the victim lodged his civil claim seeking damages in the amounts of 34,159,008 Armenian drams (AMD) and 119,000 United States dollars (USD). 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0424JUD000622809

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2014

24 avril 2014

On that occasion it was Viktor Lagutin who had passed the parcel to X at his brother’s request. After that, X had continued to call Ivan Lagutin regularly.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1031JUD005955011

Admin. suprême

31 octobre 2019

31 octobre 2019

In addition, officer G. testified before the court that on the morning after the applicant had been delivered from Yalta, he, and officer Gon., had taken a parcel from the applicant’s father for the applicant

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0421JUD001195607

Admin. suprême

21 avril 2009

21 avril 2009

Firstly, the court issuing the warrant for his arrest did not have the authority to do so and, secondly, the facts of which he was accused did not amount to a triable offence in Malta. 56.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0329JUD000339403

Admin. suprême

29 mars 2010

29 mars 2010

manoeuvres that jeopardised the safety of the French frigate and the lives of the sailors on board the speedboat; that it was also reported that the crew of the Winner were seen to be throwing suspicious parcels

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD005465507

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2013

27 juin 2013

The temporary detention centre did not refuse to accept food parcels for the inmates.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1107JUD002138004

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2013

7 novembre 2013

xa0;   According to an undated letter from the Governor of the Sokal Correctional Colony, during his detention in the Colony the applicant had not met with his relatives, though he had received parcels

Source officielle

Page 45 sur 47

← PrécédentSuivant →